[ RadSafe ] Lost check source

Geo>K0FF GEOelectronics at netscape.com
Wed Dec 12 10:22:54 CST 2007


Thanks for that reference Jim. My information came directly from telephonic 
communications yesterday with the  NRC Material Licensing
office in Lisle IL, and also from our state office of materials licensing.

To quote them both:

"Exempt is Exempt, we *ENCOURAGE* responsible disposal of exempt quantity 
sealed sources but don't mandate it. Individual institutions are free to 
require their own rules and regulation that exceed ours, but are not 
required to do so"


George Dowell

NLNL
New London Nucleonics Lab


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Tracy" <james.tracy at nist.gov>
To: <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:56 AM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Lost check source


> The following NRC link provides detail on exempt quantity sources owned by 
> a specific licensee.
>
> http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/brochures/br0117/991.html
>
>
> Jim Tracy
> NIST
>
>>------------
>>
>>Message: 6
>>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:33 EST
>>From: BLHamrick at aol.com
>>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Lost Check Source
>>To: GRMarshall at philotechnics.com, radsafe at radlab.nl
>>Message-ID: <c51.1bb178f5.34909125 at aol.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>
>>
>>
>>What Glenn says is generally true, because NRC and most other Agreement
>>States exempt "persons" from licensing, not the specific "items."  So, if 
>>you are
>>a "person" already specifically licensed, you cannot be a "person 
>>exempt."
>>California's regulations, however, exempt the items, not the  persons, so 
>>if
>>the item was manufactured and distributed under an NRC  E-distribution 
>>license
>>(or an Agreement State E-license for certain NARM), then,  in California, 
>>the
>>item is exempt from the regulations to the extent authorized  by the 
>>exemption
>>(some exemptions have limitations), including disposal, because 
>>California
>>regulations define "possession" to include receipt, possession, use, 
>>transfer
>>or disposal of radioactive material (see 17 CCR 30100(n).
>>
>>Barbara L. Hamrick
>>
>>
>>In a message dated 12/11/2007 1:52:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>>GRMarshall at philotechnics.com writes:
>>
>>If the  client has a license, then all radioactive material in his
>>possession is  licensed material.  He can't just say "Oh, it's exempt -
>>never  mind."  Refer to 10 CFR 20.2001.  It's not reportable under 10  CFR
>>20.2201.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 





More information about the RadSafe mailing list