AW: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear

[Franz Schönhofer]

Sandy,

This post is really interesting. You write to Ruth "Your points are well
taken." To me, who supported the opinion of Ruth, you wrote that my
"statement".... "Ios ludicrous (your spelling)" and you distributed it as
well to the list. What is the difference - that Ruth is obviously a
US-citizen and I am not? 

Come on, Sandy. This is an international list and not a list restricted to
US citizens. From somebody who travels such a lot one would expect a little
broader view on radiation protection than the narrow US one you obviously
propagate since some time (thinking of your comments on SI units....). 

I think it is about the time that you return to your status of a widely
accepted and well reputated scientist, who's "news" I have distributed even
to my own Austrian list of news from the radiation protection world.  

Best wishes and best regards from a country which is almost exactly 10% of
the "all important Nambia", has very little oil and no uranium. 

Franz

Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
MinRat i.R.
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Wien/Vienna
AUSTRIA


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im Auftrag
von Sandy Perle
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Jänner 2007 22:42
An: radsafe at radlab.nl; Ruth Sponsler; jmarshall.reber at comcast.net
Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear 

On 22 Jan 2007 at 19:44, Ruth Sponsler wrote:

> Who is Jim Bell and why is he requesting his material
> to be posted to Radsafe?
> 
> Such material is easily available on the internet, and
> I'm sure that almost all the members of this list have
> been heavily exposed to such opinions during their
> college years and while reading newspapers etc.  

Hi Ruth,

Your points are well taken. The primary reason I went ahead and posted the
information was 
because of all the pro-nuclear and nuclear renaissance, as well as concerns
raised by the 
current NRC Chair. Otherwise, I agree that the posting would not add any
value to the 
dialogue.

On another issue, Marshall Reber and I have corresponded and I definitely
concur that I 
should have put Mr. Bell's entire article in quotes to categorically make it
understood that all 
of the posting was his beliefs, and not mine. I treated this posting as
other news postings, 
and don't use quotes. I do however understand that this is not a case of
posting a news 
article from the wire services, and, should have used the quotes. However,
my pro-nuclear 
support should not have been questioned, as was the case in one posting. My
35+ years 
supporting the nuclear option is well documented and I apologize to nobody
regarding that.

Regards,

Sandy

Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614 

Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714  Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144

E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl at cox.net 

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/