[ RadSafe ] Re: The cost of irrational fear
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 3 15:20:31 CDT 2007
If the utilities think they will make a profit, the
plants will be built, no matter what the initial costs
are. It is a economic issue. If the utilities have
to start paying a carbon tax, you will see more
emphasis on nuclear and renewable energy sources.
--- Doug Aitken <jdaitken at sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com>
wrote:
> At 12:46 PM 7/3/2007, John Jacobus wrote:
> >And yet, despite all of the terrible things the
> >anti-nuclear people say; the ICRP, NCRP, etc.
> publish;
> >the fear-mongering of the professional societies;
> the
> >BEIR reports; ALARA; the LNT; Mangano and
> Sternglass;
> >etc., we still have nuclear power and will be
> building
> >more plants. Isn't that amazing!
> >
> >Maybe the concerns of some on this list are
> misplaced.
>
> I think it might be better to say "we may be
> building more plants, in spite
> of ridiculous costs incurred by meeting the
> requirements and regulations
> generated by all the fear-mongers, politicians and
> their ass-covering
> bureaucratic minions...."
>
> Or is that a little too direct?
> ;~)
> Regards
> Doug (personal observation only: does NOT reflect
> the opinions or position
> of the companies I may advise......)
>
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++
Few of their children in the country learn English... The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages ... Unless the stream of their importation could be turned they will soon so outnumber us that all the advantages we have will not be able to preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious.
-- Benjamin Franklin, circa 1750, on German immigration to Pennsylvania
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list