AW: [ RadSafe ] Technology to detect radiation

[John Jacobus]

Franz,
I am not sure what you are an "expert" in, but there
many of us who try to keep an open mind about
information posted on this list-server.  You imply
that an "expert" is wrong, yet you do not recognize
that you yourself may and were wrong.

As another thought, the women may have had a thallium
stress test of her heart.  Many chemotherapy agents
used in cancer treatments damage cardiac output.  

--- Franz Schönhofer <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
wrote:

> Elsa,
> 
> You are right, you missed it, though I addressed my
> comment also directly to
> you. I have very clearly given facts (facts indeed
> and no speculations),
> that such a setting off of a radiation detector
> after treatment of breast
> cancer is not possible. I have also given a possible
> explanation that the
> person in question had undergone diagnosis for
> metastases - which also was
> put forward by another poster. 
> 
> The "expert" I mentioned has forwarded literature,
> which clearly shows, that
> my comment is absolutely correct. That he is not
> able to recognize it is not
> my, but his problem, but it justifies to put
> inverted commas on his
> description as an "expert". Of course I know since
> long that he is an expert
> on unfounded flaming and in case he runs out of
> arguments he resorts to
> personal attacks.   
> 
> Of course George is right and I extend the statement
> for the USA further
> beyond the borders of the USA and especially to
> Europe. So this is another
> clear statement, that no patient could start an
> alarm. 
> 
> That implant of seeds are used in the treatment of
> other cancers is more
> than well known, but this was not the question in
> this thread. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Franz
> 
> Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
> MinRat i.R.
> Habicherg. 31/7
> A-1160 Wien/Vienna
> AUSTRIA
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im Auftrag
> von nimmoelsa at netscape.net
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. August 2007 05:00
> An: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: [ RadSafe ] Technology to detect radiation
> 
> 
> There has been A LOT of verbiage, so possibly I
> missed it, but as far as
> I've seen,?no one has given?a clear?"yes, I know
> of?a current?THERAPEUTIC
> treatment?for breast cancer that, used in its
> routine manner without an
> accident, would account for?a patient?setting off a
> rad detector at a ball
> game & here is the citation".? 
> 
> On the other side, George Dowell seems to have done
> a lot of
> checking?that?suggests, at least in the
> US,?there?aren't seeds or other
> radiation sources?are used for breast cancer
> treatment?(again, I mean for
> treatment, not diagnosis) that are allowed to remain
> in place on a
> "permanent" basis.? 
> 
> But of course?showing some form of treatment?DOESN'T
> exist is kind?of
> impossible & we all know?what doesn't exist today
> may well exist tomorrow.
> 
> Elsa?
> 
> 

+++++++++++++++++++
"All of the old-timers knew that subprime mortgages were what we called neutron loans --  they killed the people and left the houses. . . .
"LOUIS S. BARNES, a partner at Boulder West, a mortgage banking firm.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469