AW: [ RadSafe ] RE: Proposed Rebuttal to the Laura Weldon Articleinbold Text

[Steven Dapra]

Jan. 24

         So far, I'm with Franz on this one.  The IAEA has no business 
imposing sanctions on anyone over bomb building.  Funny, isn't it, how the 
USSR could have all the nukes it wanted, along with a vast fleet of 
missiles to deliver them, and no one said anything -- including the 
IAEA.  The same goes for Communist China, and it's still a going concern 
(for anyone who might want to offer the excuse that the USSR is no 
more).  What goes for the IAEA also goes for the UN Security Council.  It's 
not running the world.

         Gary wrote:  "Iran is confident that once they possess just a few 
nuclear weapons, no one will dare to prevent them from making more."  The 
same could be said of the afore-mentioned and now defunct USSR, and the 
current regime in Peking.  In fact, I remember seeing a news item online in 
the last week or two wherein Putin said Russia might use nukes in the 
future in the need arose.  Something doesn't match up here.  Does Israel 
have The Bomb, or is it only fooling around still trying to separate enough 
U to build one?  (hint, hint)

Steven Dapra



At 08:05 PM 1/24/08 -0600, garyi at trinityphysics.com wrote:
>On 25 Jan 2008 at 1:03, Franz Schönhofer wrote:
>
>. The reluctance of the IAEA
>to impose sanctions on Iran is a very good sign, that Iran has until
>now fulfilled all conditions of the IAEA - no other country is
>therefore entitled to demand whatsoever.
>================
>
>That reluctance is by no means any indication of compliance.  IAEA, which 
>has my best
>wishes, could sooner suspend the motion of the earth around the sun than 
>make Iran comply
>with any directive.  IAEA  (and the EU in general) is a source of derision 
>for many Iranians,
>exactly because they repeatedly defy Security Council sanctions and ignore 
>deadlines. Then
>they play a PR game and pretend to be the offended party.
>
>No, I imagine that the real reason that no effective sanctions have been 
>imposed is that
>Russia and China have too much to lose.  And if it is nationalistic 
>thinking you hate, cast your
>gaze upon Iran (the ruling regime, that is).  Most of the world knows what 
>game is being
>played there.  Iran is confident that once they possess just a few nuclear 
>weapons, no one
>will dare to prevent them from making more.
>
>Gary Isenhower
>
>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Gary Isenhower, M.S.
>713-690-3020