[ RadSafe ] Lung, Liver, and Bone Cancer in Mayak Workers due to Plutonium
garyi at trinityphysics.com
garyi at trinityphysics.com
Tue Jun 17 13:13:46 CDT 2008
Hi Cindy,
I probably should not advertise my ignorance :)
However, here's part of the abstract (emphasis mine):
By December 31, 2003, 681 lung cancer deaths, 75 liver cancer deaths and 30 bone
cancer deaths had occurred. Of these 786 deaths, 239 (30%) were attributed to plutonium
exposure. Significant plutonium dose-response relationships (p < 0.001) were observed
for all 3 endpoints, with lung and liver cancer risks reasonably described by linear
functions. At attained age 60, the ERRs per Gy for lung cancer were 7.1 for males and 15
for females; the averaged-attained age ERRs for liver cancer were 2.6 and 29 for
males and females, respectively; those for bone cancer were 0.76 and 3.4. This study is
the first to present and compare dose-response analyses for cancers of all 3 organs.
For liver Ca, the reported ERRs were 2.6 and 29, male vs female. Could the ERR ratio for
females and males really be >10 ? Or is that just a droped decimal point?
-Gary
--------------------------------------------------
On 16 Jun 2008 at 21:32, Cindy Bloom wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:32:37 -0400
To: garyi at trinityphysics.com, <radsafe at radlab.nl>
From: Cindy Bloom <radbloom at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Lung, Liver, and Bone Cancer in Mayak Workers
due to Plutonium
Gary,
In another abstract http://www.rrjournal.org/perlserv/?request=get-
abstract&doi=10.1667%2F0033-
7587(2000)154%5B0246%3ALCIMW%5D2.0.CO%3B2&ct=1, it was noted that:
"Relative risks tended to be higher for females than for males, probably because of
the lower baseline risk and the higher levels of plutonium measured in females. "
This might be part of your answer. Because this other paper was discussing risk not
risk/dose, only the baseline part of the argument would apply. It would be interesting to
see the error estimates associated with the risk estimates, as well as the numbers in
the subpopulations.
Cindy
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list