Re: [ RadSafe ] Man Pleads Guilty to “Dirty Bomb ” Hoax

Clayton J Bradt cjb01 at health.state.ny.us
Tue Mar 4 08:30:25 CST 2008


DHS, NNSA, DOJ, congress and others have all  been pushing the RDD "denial
of access" scenario for all its worth.  By insisting on tracking down every
last ionizing event with hundreds (thousands?) of stationary and hand-held
detectors, they distract public attention from the real dangers which
governments have done practically nothing to address e.g. chemical plants,
firearms, explosives.

Clayton J. Bradt



                                                                           
             Steven Dapra                                                  
             <sjd at swcp.com>                                                
                                                                        To 
             03/03/2008 09:44          Clayton J Bradt                     
             PM                        <cjb01 at health.state.ny.us>,         
                                       radsafe at radlab.nl                   
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [ RadSafe ] Man Pleads Guilty   
                                       to  “Dirty Bomb ” Hoax           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




March 3

Clayton:

        How do you figure "The US government have been the real
perpetrators of this hoax."?   At present I am not disupting your
suggestion, I merely would like to know what has caused you to draw that
conclusion.

Steven Dapra


At 09:32 AM 3/3/08 -0500, Clayton J Bradt wrote:

      Friday, February 29, 2008

      Man Pleads Guilty to "Dirty Bomb" Hoax

      A Wisconsin man could be sentenced to five years in prison after
      pleading
      guilty yesterday to claiming online that terrorists planned to use
      radiological "dirty bombs" against seven National Football League
      stadiums,
      the Associated Press reported (see GSN, Oct. 23, 2006).

      On about 40 occasions from September to October 2006, Jake Brahm
      posted a
      message on a Web site claiming that attacks were planned on Oct. 22
      of that
      year in Atlanta, Cleveland, Houston, Miami, New York, Oakland and
      Seattle.

      "The death toll will approach 100,000 from the initial blasts and
      countless
      other fatalities will later occur as [a] result from radioactive
      fallout,"
      the message stated.

      A federal grand jury one year ago indicted the 22-year-old Wauwatosa
      man
      under the Patriot Act for willfully conveying false information
      regarding
      attacks on the stadiums involving weapons of mass destruction and
      "radiological dispersal devices."

      He is scheduled for sentencing in federal court in New Jersey on June
      5.
      Along with up to five years in prison, Brahm could be fined $250,000.

      "This was the Internet version of yelling fire in a crowded theater,
      but to
      a much wider audience," U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie said in a
      statement. "I don't think anyone needs to be reminded in this day how
      serious and dangerous such conduct is."  (Jeffrey Gold, Associated
      Press/USA
      Today, Feb. 28).
      *****************************************************************************


      The US government have been the real perpetrators of this hoax.  This
      guy
      was dumb enough to believe it.  So was the jury, apparently.

      Clayton J. Bradt


IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure.  It is intended only for the addressee.  If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments.  Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.



More information about the RadSafe mailing list