[ RadSafe ] New evidence on brain tumors from cell phones?

[garyi at trinityphysics.com]

Thanks for that link.  Although it talks about neuron damage and increased permeability of 
the blood-brain barrier, it also discredits the brain tumour claims of the Swedish group.

So, I feel good about brain tumour claims being discredited, but also keen to see if anyone 
reproduces the albumin results.  Till then I have to kind of agree with Mike's comments.

-Gary Isenhower

On 6 May 2008 at 11:44, Riely, Brian P. wrote:

Subject:        	RE: [ RadSafe ] New evidence on brain tumors from cell phones?
Date sent:      	Tue, 6 May 2008 11:44:58 -0500
From:           	"Riely, Brian P." <brian.riely at ngc.com>
To:             	<garyi at trinityphysics.com>, <radsafe at radlab.nl>,
	"Nils Rudqvist" <nils_rudqvist at hotmail.com>

> An interesting article: 
> http://www.protectingourhealth.org/newscience/learning/2003/2003-0129s
> alfordetal.htm 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
> Behalf Of garyi at trinityphysics.com Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:19
> PM To: radsafe at radlab.nl; Nils Rudqvist Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] New
> evidence on brain tumors from cell phones?
> 
> I could be wrong, but I don't think that anybody has confirmed that
> cell phone/brain tumour link.  I believe several studies have
> attempted to do so and failed.  Currently I'm ignoring any cell phone
> studies that come out of Sweden, because it seems like one group there
> is making all the noise - kind of like Salasman here in the US.  
> 
> That's the problem with losing credibility.  Even if you do good
> science afterwards nobody listens to you, so you sort of get typecast.
> 
> -Gary Isenhower
>