[ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor Deployment

Livesey, Lee M Lee_M_Livesey at RL.gov
Tue Sep 9 09:48:25 CDT 2008


Basic military strategy...........
"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." - Sun Tzu

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf Of garyi at trinityphysics.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:28 AM
To: BLHamrick at aol.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor Deployment

No, that's not a good analogy, because there is a history of terrorist attacks culminating in the
911 attack, but tigers have never attacked you or your neighbours, and you did not plant the
palm trees in an effort to protect yourself from tigers.

It might be better to say that at one time there were widespread tiger attacks, and then after
some counter action, the vast majority of tiger attacks are concentrated in one place where
tiger killers lay in wait.  That's more in line with the actual situation.

-Gary Isenhower


On 8 Sep 2008 at 20:19, BLHamrick at aol.com wrote:

From:                   BLHamrick at aol.com
Date sent:              Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:19:28 EDT
Subject:                Re: [ RadSafe ] Concerns Could Reduce Radiation Sensor
Deployment
To:                     cjb01 at health.state.ny.us, HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net
Copies to:              radsafe at radlab.nl

[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]

Oh, that's quite funny, and absolutely true.

Also, in response to Howard, I have to say that the fact that there
have  not been other attacks in the U.S. is no proof that anything
we've done has  been effective.  I could as easily say that the palm
trees in my back yard  are effective tiger repellents, because I
haven't ever had a tiger in my back  yard.

Barbara


In a message dated 9/8/2008 8:55:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
cjb01 at health.state.ny.us writes:

SDI is  actually a pretty good analogy.  It works, but only if there
is  only one missile at a time and we know its coming and what its
trajectory  will be. Detecting nukes at the border would be effective
under  similar circumstances: If we know the terrorist is coming, when
he's coming  and where, it will be no problem to identify the nuke
he's  carrying.




**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion
blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
  (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
_______________________________________________ You are currently
subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/



More information about the RadSafe mailing list