[ RadSafe ] Government eyes Supertanker for dirty duty
Doug Huffman
doug.huffman at wildblue.net
Fri Aug 21 09:59:27 CDT 2009
It seems that to be effectively dirty the specific activity would be too
high to handle without acute health effects in assembly.
Perrero, Daren wrote:
> Thank you Barbara for the quick interject.
>
> I'd also add that dirty bombs run a range of effect just like raising
> the kiloton yield on a fission device gives a range. In the case of a
> dirty bomb it could be a small black powder pipe bomb with a solid
> source strapped to it creating radioactive shrapnel to a fertilizer
> device with a dispersible radioactive powder (and various combinations
> of the above), but in ALL CASES, no where near comparable in results
> when it comes to the radiation/radioactivity that's released in a
> fission event.
>
> The opinions expresses are mine, all mine.....
> I'm with the government and I'm here to help you (ack!)
> daren.perrero(a)Illinois.gov
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list