[ RadSafe ] Re: More on cell phones

Andycgeo at aol.com Andycgeo at aol.com
Thu Dec 31 09:59:48 CST 2009


Microwaves and cell phones produce Non-Ionizing Radiation and do not look  
for carcinogenic effects caused by ionizing radiation
 
Andy george 
 
 
In a message dated 12/31/2009 10:54:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
maay100 at bgu.ac.il writes:

I agree  that no significant clinical effects have yet been found with   
microwaves and with cell phones, and I certainly am against the hype   
on the subject. To be the devil's advocate, however, there appears  to  
be some local heating to the part of the brain adjacent to the  cell  
phone, the biomedical significance of which is not clear. As is  well  
known, manifestation of the carcinogenic effects of  ionizing  
radiation can be delayed many years, even as many as 25  years after  
the initial exposure. How long have cell phones been  around - maybe  
10? It would therefore be wise to reserve judgement  on the long term  
consequences of cell phone use and to encourage the  use of earphones  
for those who use cellphones intensely.
Mike  Quastel MD PhD (Nuc Med)

On Dec 31, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Steven Dapra  wrote:

> Dec. 30
>
>          Thank you for posting this, Susan.
>
>       Here is a link to an article by Prof. Park in Forbes about   
> Brodeur and his claim that EMFs cause leukemia, etc., etc.   http:// 
> www.electrowarmth.com/emf.php
>
> Steven  Dapra
>
>
> At 04:25 PM 12/30/2009, Susan Gawarecki  wrote:
>> Below is a physicist's take on the issue. Bob Park takes  no  
>> prisoners!
>>
>> --Susan  Gawarecki
>>
>> >From Bob Park's "What's New" 25 Dec  09:
>>
>> 2. WARNING! CELL PHONES ARE FOUND TO EMIT  BULLSH*T.
>> >From San Francisco to Maine there is a campaign to  require cancer  
>> warning
>> labels on cell phones.  Fact: cell phone radiation doesn't cause  
>>  cancer.
>> Cancer agents break chemical bonds, creating mutant  strands of DNA.
>> Microwave photons cannot break chemical bonds.  This is not  
>> debatable. In
>> 1989, Paul Brodeur, a  staff writer for the New Yorker, claimed in  
>> a  series
>> of sensational articles that electromagnetic fields from  power  
>> lines cause
>> childhood leukemia  http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN89/ 
>> wn082589.html .
>>  Brodeur, however, understood none of this and when virtually every
>>  scientist agreed that it was impossible, Brodeur took their  
>>  unanimity as
>> proof of a massive cover-up. Other anti-science  know-nothings  
>> followed
>> Brodeur's lead, shifting  their attack to cell phone radiation.  
>> Cell  phones
>> have since spread to almost the entire population, but with  no
>> corresponding increase in brain cancer. Case  closed.
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> You are currently  subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and  
> understood the  RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http:// 
>  radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to  subscribe or unsubscribe and other  
> settings visit:  http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

_______________________________________________
You  are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
the RadSafe rules.  These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For  information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
visit:  http://radlab.nl/radsafe/





More information about the RadSafe mailing list