[ RadSafe ] U.S. Inks Nuclear Reprocessing Deal With India

Sun Aug 8 15:47:17 CDT 2010

Please note. I did identify myself and affiliation. How else were you able
to reply? To claim otherwise is another example of your lack of
professionalism. Please grow up.

2010/8/8 Franz Schönhofer <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>

>  Joseph and RADSAFErs,
>
>
>
> ONCE FOR ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> If you do not like my posts you have two possibilities – you can delete
> them immediately or even more convenient your browser allows you to prevent
> them to be shown and being deleted automatically.
>
>
>
> Why I am allowed to post on RADSAFE? Simply because this is an
> international list of scientists and until now – I hope that Terry will not
> change this to make it a nationalistic US site, dominated by US Army posters
> – it is open to all scientists. That I am a world wide acknowledged
> scientist should be clear to everybody except one troll on RADSAFE.* *As
> far as I know* *from my extensive lessons at school decades ago there is
> something like “free speech” in the USA. Has it be changed and depends now
> on the judgement of Joseph Alvarez?
>
>
>
> Joseph, your post is not worth to waste more time on it. You have not
> bothered to identify yourself and your affiliation, so you do not follow
> RADSAFE rules and I think this would be a theoretical reason to ban  y o
> u  from the list.
>
>
>
> If you claim, that I do not post anything constructive – read my posts
> first.
>
>
>
> My utmost disdain,
>
>
>
> Franz
>
> * *
>
> I already posted my request that
>
> Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
>
> MinRat i.R.
>
> Habicherg. 31/7
>
> A-1160 Wien/Vienna
>
> AUSTRIA
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> *Von:* Joseph Alvarez [mailto:jalvabeta at gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Samstag, 07. August 2010 00:04
> *An:* Franz Schönhofer
> *Cc:* Clayton J Bradt; radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> *Betreff:* Re: [ RadSafe ] U.S. Inks Nuclear Reprocessing Deal With India
>
>
>
> Why is Franz Schoenhofer allowed to post ot RADSAFE? Please restrict this
> person from posting. He does not post anything constructive.
>
> 2010/8/6 Franz Schönhofer <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
>
> Dear Clayton and RADSAFErs,
>
> Reading the news you distribute I just wonder whether I have been always in
> a dream - I thought that there were some international treaties about the
> proliferation of nuclear material, nuclear technology etc. etc. I do not
> have the details about this treaty and am to lazy to look after them.
>
> Similar treaties were used by the USA to accuse Iraq for breaching these
> international treaties and therefore "justifying" the invasion which keeps
> the world still busy and resulted up to now in hundreds of thousands of
> casualties.
>
> However this message is revealing, that obviously international treaties
> are
> binding for all nations on earth - except the USA.....
>
> Please give me a reasonable explanation or flame me for being anti-American
> - better Anti-US!
>
>
> Franz
>
> Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
> MinRat i.R.
> Habicherg. 31/7
> A-1160 Wien/Vienna
> AUSTRIA
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] Im Auftrag von Clayton J
> Bradt
> Gesendet: Montag, 02. August 2010 21:52
>
> An: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>
> Betreff: [ RadSafe ] U.S. Inks Nuclear Reprocessing Deal With India
>
> U.S. Inks Nuclear Reprocessing Deal With India
>
> Monday, Aug. 2, 2010
>
> India and the United States on Friday inked a deal that would permit the
> nuclear-armed South Asian nation to reprocess used U.S.-supplied nuclear
> fuel as part of a broader bilateral trade cooperation agreement, Agence
> France-Presse reported (see GSN, June 2).
>
> The latest agreement demonstrates the Obama administration's "strong
> commitment to building successfully on the landmark U.S.-India Civil
> Nuclear Cooperation Initiative and is a prerequisite for U.S. nuclear fuel
> suppliers to conduct business with India," the State Department said in a
> release.
>
> U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns and
> Indian Ambassador to the United States Meera Shankar signed the
> reprocessing deal. Washington previously had only signed such agreements
> with Japan and European Union states.
>
> The comprehensive deal on trade in atomic material and equipment was
> signed in 2008 during the Bush administration. However, U.S. firms have
> yet to begin doing nuclear business in India as Washington and New Delhi
> continued to hammer out the last particulars of the agreement. During that
> time, French and Russian atomic companies have rushed to enter India's
> expanding nuclear power market.
>
> The recycling of used U.S. nuclear material is to take place at a new
> plant under the watch of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the State
> Department said (Agence France-Presse/Google News, July 31).
>
> State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said "today marks one of the final
> steps in terms of implementation of the U.S.-India Civilian Nuclear
> Cooperation Agreement," the Hindustan Times reported.
>
> New Delhi and Washington would like to see all remaining barriers to full
> implementation of the deal dealt with prior to President Barack Obama's
> trip to India in November (Anirudh Bhattacharyya, Hindustan Times I, Aug.
> 1).
>
> The last major hurdle to the deal is Indian nuclear liability legislation
> that limits how much foreign firms can be required to pay out following an
> atomic disaster at one of their plants. A bill on the matter has been held
> up in India's Parliament due to strong criticism from opposition lawmakers
> concerned the measure does not adequately account for the interests of
> potential Indian victims. Without a liability cap, though, U.S. firms are
> unable to secure insurance to operate in the South Asian nation.
>
> In order to secure passage of the bill before Obama's trip, sources said
> there is a chance of increasing the financial damages for which nuclear
> plant operators could be held liable. Liability is currently set at less
> than $110 million the Times reported.
>
> The legislation could also be amended to make the details of agreements
> between plant operators and nuclear material suppliers more open to public
> scrutiny, the sources said.
>
> India's coalition government is optimistic these tweaks to the bill would
> secure enough votes to win parliamentary approval.
>
> A senior opposition lawmaker, however, indicated there were additional
> points of contention to be addressed. "The cap apart, there are issues
> regarding environment and public health to be addressed. And the argument
> that American life is more precious than Indian life is not acceptable,"
> the Bharatiya Janata Party leader said (Jayanth Jacob, Hindustan Times II,
> Aug. 1).
> ********************************
> Let's see now.  We don't reprocess nuclear fuel here in the US because the
> danger of diversion of plutonium for weapons is too great.  So we build a
> reprocessing plant in India instead where the danger of diversion is
> lower?
>
> Clayton Bradt
> dutchbradt at hughes.net
>
>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
> or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or
> otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for
> the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not
> authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or
> any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
> delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph L. Alvarez, PhD, CHP
> Alpha Beta Gamut
> 716 Schenley Rd.
> Knoxville, TN 37923
> Phone: 865-591-0175
>

-- 
Joseph L. Alvarez, PhD, CHP
Alpha Beta Gamut
716 Schenley Rd.
Knoxville, TN 37923
Phone: 865-591-0175