[ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 488, Issue 1
David Grammer
dg at radata.com
Fri Dec 10 13:31:38 CST 2010
Funny you should ask.
We just had a 2 detector system refurbished by Canberra.
It was literally returned today.
It comes complete with nim bins 2 PMTs & all electronics.
Give me a call or email me directly.
Thank you,
David Grammer
dg at radata.com
27 Ironia Road
Flanders, NJ 07836
(973) 927-7303 phone
(973) 927-8221 fax
www.radata.com
If you can't open our Adobe
PDF attachments, get the
New version 9 reader here:
get.adobe.com/reader/
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
radsafe-request at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 1:00 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: RadSafe Digest, Vol 488, Issue 1
Send RadSafe mailing list submissions to
radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://health.phys.iit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
Or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
radsafe-request at health.phys.iit.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
radsafe-owner at health.phys.iit.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RadSafe digest..."
Important!
To keep threads/discussions more easily readable PLEASE observe the
following guideline when replying to a message or digest:
1. When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of radsafe digest ..."
2. Do NOT include the entire digest in your reply. Include ONLY the germane
sentences to which you're responding.
Thanks!_______________________________________________
Today's Topics:
1. RADON TESTING (McCulley, Joseph)
2. Re: RADON TESTING (lcs at golden.net)
3. "... authority for the construction of dangerous and dirty
new nuclear reactors ..." (Maury Siskel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:18:37 -0400
From: "McCulley, Joseph" <JMcCulley at nbpower.com>
Subject: [ RadSafe ] RADON TESTING
To: <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Message-ID:
<6E9225796E25A74880158A0CD0207F360B9A462D at PLGSEXCH1.nbpower.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Will anyone recommend a place where we can buy the necessary equipment
to do radon testing (short term and long term)? We want to be able to
do the analyses ourselves. Thanks!
Joe McCulley, CHP
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is intended
only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission, distribution,
dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the original and
any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately. Your
co-operation is appreciated.
Le present courriel (y compris toute piece jointe) s'adresse uniquement a
son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et pourrait
comporter des renseignements privilegies ou confidentiels. Si vous n'etes
pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de
retransmettre, de distribuer, de disseminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce
courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre facon.
Si vous avez recu le present courriel par erreur, priere de communiquer avec
l'expediteur et d'eliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
electronique ou imprimee de celui-ci, immediatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:35:50 -0500
From: <lcs at golden.net>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RADON TESTING
To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
List" <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Message-ID: <9795728714aa074c3e6602b1463f7cdc at golden.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Good day Joe,
I highly recommend the EPERM system manufactured by Rad Elec, Inc.,
5716-A Industry Lane, Frederick, Maryland 21704 (Phone: 800-526-5482 /
301-694-0011). I've been using their devices since 1988 - the
methodology produces very accurate results, when the EPA was running
their radon measurement proficiency program, I consistantly had results
with a mean average relative error within 2% of actual.
Their website is <radelec.com>.
Best regards,
Michael LaFontaine, P.Phys.
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:18:37 -0400, "McCulley, Joseph"
<JMcCulley at nbpower.com> wrote:
> Will anyone recommend a place where we can buy the necessary
> equipment
> to do radon testing (short term and long term)? We want to be able
> to
> do the analyses ourselves. Thanks!
>
> Joe McCulley, CHP
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail,
> is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this
> e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
> Le present courriel (y compris toute piece jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement a son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilegies ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disseminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre facon. Si vous avez recu le
> present courriel par erreur, priere de communiquer avec l'expediteur
> et d'eliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> electronique ou imprimee de celui-ci, immediatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:46:58 -0600
From: Maury Siskel <maurysis at peoplepc.com>
Subject: [ RadSafe ] "... authority for the construction of dangerous
and dirty new nuclear reactors ..."
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Message-ID: <4D01E902.5070801 at peoplepc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Dear Radsafers,
If you are so inclined, you might express your political opinion to your
senators along the lines I've suggested below. This political issue
poses a scientific issue every bit as much as a political one -- thus
the only rationale for posting my letter on radsafe. The issue below
relates, I think, to the license renewal application for the Calvert
Cliffs plant in Maryland.
Best regards,
Maury&Dog [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
==============================
Dear Senator,
"I have just learned that the House version of the Continuing Resolution
includes another $7 Billion in loan authority for the construction of
dangerous and dirty new nuclear reactors in the U.S. This would be
appropriated through the Title 17 loan guarantee program via the
upcoming Continuing Resolution."
The above quote is the claim of some anti-nuclear organizations. I am
pleased that the House passed this resolution. I believe the $7 billion
is for a loan guarantee -- not for a loan.
I believe the Congress should promote all forms of energy production.
Nuclear power in particular is about as clean as one might ask. I
believe it could be the least costly if opponents would stop using the
courts to delay and otherwise increase artificially the cost of
producing electricity by means of nuclear power.
I hope you will promote initially a freeze on any increase in federal
appropriations. Subsequently, I hope you will promote at least a small
percentage cut across the board on all federal spending. These measures
could begin the process of reducing our fantastic debt
Sincerely,
Maury Siskel
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
RadSafe mailing list
RadSafe at health.phys.iit.edu
http://health.phys.iit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
End of RadSafe Digest, Vol 488, Issue 1
***************************************
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list