[ RadSafe ] Cardiolite Fate

Bill DeForest billd at prophysics.com
Sun May 23 16:14:11 CDT 2010


I agree, more like 5 mR/hr at a meter not at 4 meters.

Bill DeForest, CHP, DABR
President, ProPhysics Innovations, Inc.
billd at prophysics.com 
400 Dominion Drive, #109 Morrisville, NC 27560 
(800) 835-3615 
(919) 465-2545 
Fax: (919) 465-2544


www.prophysics.com


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Alston, Chris
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:12 PM
To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Cardiolite Fate

P.S.  That exposure rate sounds quite high to me (5 mR/h at 4 meters).  That would imply 80 mR/h at one meter!!  One would have to give a normal-sized patient ~500 mCi I-131 to get a number like that.  Are you sure of the calibration?  You might also want to double-check the energy response curve.

Cheers
cja



Dear Group: 
Yesterday I received both Tl-201 & Tc-99m as a intravenous cocktail during a 
cardiac stress test.  The dose was 3 mCi Tl-201 and 20 mCi "Cardiolite" 
Tc-99m for imaging.  By the time I got home, I was quite radioactive, with 
my Ludlum Model 19 measuring 5000 uR/Hr at a distance of 4 meters. 
According to the information that I received, the test amounts to a 3.45 REM 
total effective dose. 
Should I be avoiding my girlfriend for the next week or two?  She works at 
Los Alamos and I don't want to "contaminate" her. 

  

The good news is that no problems were found! 

  

Comments? 

  

Dan ii 

  

-- 
Dan W McCarn, Geologist 
108 Sherwood Drive 
Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425 
+1-505-310-3922 (Mobile - New Mexico) 
 <mailto:HotGreenChile at gmail.com>  <mailto:HotGreenChile at gmail.com> 
HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com 

  

  

_______________________________________________ 
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list 

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html 

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu 
_______________________________________________ 
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list 

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html 

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5125 (20100518) __________ 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. 

http://www.eset.com 


  

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5128 (20100519) __________ 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. 

http://www.eset.com 
  

_______________________________________________ 
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list 

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html 

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu 

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5136 (20100521) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 



More information about the RadSafe mailing list