[ RadSafe ] Cardiolite Fate
Bill DeForest
billd at prophysics.com
Sun May 23 16:14:11 CDT 2010
I agree, more like 5 mR/hr at a meter not at 4 meters.
Bill DeForest, CHP, DABR
President, ProPhysics Innovations, Inc.
billd at prophysics.com
400 Dominion Drive, #109 Morrisville, NC 27560
(800) 835-3615
(919) 465-2545
Fax: (919) 465-2544
www.prophysics.com
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Alston, Chris
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:12 PM
To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Cardiolite Fate
P.S. That exposure rate sounds quite high to me (5 mR/h at 4 meters). That would imply 80 mR/h at one meter!! One would have to give a normal-sized patient ~500 mCi I-131 to get a number like that. Are you sure of the calibration? You might also want to double-check the energy response curve.
Cheers
cja
Dear Group:
Yesterday I received both Tl-201 & Tc-99m as a intravenous cocktail during a
cardiac stress test. The dose was 3 mCi Tl-201 and 20 mCi "Cardiolite"
Tc-99m for imaging. By the time I got home, I was quite radioactive, with
my Ludlum Model 19 measuring 5000 uR/Hr at a distance of 4 meters.
According to the information that I received, the test amounts to a 3.45 REM
total effective dose.
Should I be avoiding my girlfriend for the next week or two? She works at
Los Alamos and I don't want to "contaminate" her.
The good news is that no problems were found!
Comments?
Dan ii
--
Dan W McCarn, Geologist
108 Sherwood Drive
Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
+1-505-310-3922 (Mobile - New Mexico)
<mailto:HotGreenChile at gmail.com> <mailto:HotGreenChile at gmail.com>
HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5125 (20100518) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5128 (20100519) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5136 (20100521) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list