[ RadSafe ] Climate Change a fraud?

[Howard Long]

Should other countries pay us, since CO2 coming into the USA (usual westerly winds) is 387 ppm and leaving is LESS at 385 ppm (both increasing)?
Our expanding forests (50% more than 50 years ago) take in more CO2 than our cars, coal buning etc put out.

Also, the only significant mortality from air pollution was 400 years ago in wood-burning, fog-retaining London. My eyes burned in summer in Pleasanton 50 years ago but not since despite 10 x the population, downwind from SF. Even in Calif., some things are better. 

Howard Long, epidemiologist 

On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:11 AM, garyi at trinityphysics.com wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> If we can do that without a crazy scheme to pay other countries for our CO2, and without 
> pretending that CO2 is industrial waste (haha, good one EPA!) and without further 
> bankrupting ourselves and our children, then count me in.
> 
> BTW, that reminds me: where are all those new nuclear power plants?  Wouldn't that be a 
> good place to start, if one was afraid of CO2?  Didn't the president promise something about 
> that?  Don't hold your breath (for all you GW true believers who nobly limit your emissions to 
> save the rest of us).
> 
> -Gary Isenhower
> 
> 
> On 2 Nov 2010 at 11:42, Doug Aitken wrote:
> 
> 
> So as (hopefully!) sane people, can we not agree that we can do a better job
> of this disposal, as a means to minimize our impact? And any talk of human
> (and animal) body emissions is a bit childish. 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Doug Aitken
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu