[ RadSafe ] Climate Change a fraud?

[Rouse, Raymond Lawrence]

I would suggest reading any work you can get your hands on from Jim
Hansen. He is a the leading scientist who bought about the idea of
global warming. He studied under Van Allen and continued the work of
Carl Sagan. He first proposed the idea in the late 70's. He was not his
own advocate rather he was totally consumed with his work. By the late
80's the world's scientists had examined his work and found it
creditable. 
Bush I and Clinton took his work seriously and Bush II also at first
took him seriously even campaigned for regulation to curb CO2 emission.
About two years later no one in the administration would even talk to
him, in fact efforts were not to silence him.

For a good book about Jim Hansen read "Censoring Science" the book is
about the man, Jim Hansen, not about Global warming.

Raymond Rouse

"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance!" 


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Dixon, John E.
(CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH)
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:04 AM
To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Climate Change a fraud?

My personal oppinion only: The climate is changing through NATURAL
processes. The true science behind the reason this change is occuring
DOES NOT indicate that human kind is the cause. If one objectively
studies the data, one can conclude that mother nature is very
unpredictable. Jumping to a conclusion driven by the extreme views of
certain organizations is simply wrong. I guess that the same kind of
conclusions could be drawn about radiation. As scientists, we all should
stick with the facts.

John Dixon

----- Original Message -----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
<radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu>
To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Fri Oct 15 04:12:51 2010
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Climate Change a fraud?


I found the following article very interesting (see link bellow). The  
matter of risk assessment has been blown to huge proportions in modern  
westertn societies and the extent and funding of risk management has  
not always been justified by facts. I think the issue (and the  
protest) put forward by Harold Lewis applies to many situations that  
we have had to deal with (myself in a hospital) in order to appease an  
often phobic public. Radiation safety is always an easy target for all  
kinds of "zealots".


D.Okkalides
THEAGENEION Anticancer Hospital
Thessaloniki
Greece

________________________________________________________________________
__

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-p
rofessor-global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscient
ific-fraud-i-have-seen-in-my-long-life/

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu