[ RadSafe ] x-rays or whatever
Johanning, Jeffrey R.
JEFFREY.R.JOHANNING at saic.com
Tue Oct 19 17:43:17 CDT 2010
I agree that we do get all wrapped around the axle about these terms.
However, (at least in CA) we are locked into this fundamental
difference. The CA regulations for radiation safety training for
radiographers (which much of the training material generally slumps over
to non-radiography) require that the units of dose and quantity of
activity be covered. I guess the level of semantics would be left up to
the trainer's discretion.
(not worth 2 cents) :)
Jeffrey R. Johanning
Health Physicist V/RSO
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of conrad i
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:24 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] x-rays or whatever
My two cents worth.
I have been to a lot of training courses for non-technical responders.
HPs, in my opinion tend to get wrapped around the axle, so to speak,
about precise terms.
I get annoyed when a CHP lectures to emergency responders, radiation
workers, etc. about, for example, the difference between a rad and
Roentgen, because the students don't care, don't need to know, and, most
importantly won't remember.
The regulators don't care generally, and for most industrial and
emergency responders purposes, a distinction without a difference.
So likewise, xray, x-ray, photon, x-radiation, etc., it does not matter
in 'industrial' training.
Its like arguing over radiological health, radiation health, or health
Conrad I. Sherman, CHP
4163 Etcheverry Hall
Berkeley, California 94720-1730
Mobile: (415) 336-7802
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
More information about the RadSafe