[ RadSafe ] protraction enhancement effect
Emmanuel.Egger at babs.admin.ch
Emmanuel.Egger at babs.admin.ch
Wed Sep 1 01:51:15 CDT 2010
Actually I remember having read a paper some twenty years ago where heavy smokers working in uranium mines had less lung cancer than none smokers!!!
Emmanuel Egger
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] Im Auftrag von HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. September 2010 01:46
An: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Cc: Jane Orient; CC
Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] protraction enhancement effect
B Cohen, (radon), B Scott, (CTs), Cuttler (low dose Rx), Pollycove (experimental studies) and the Taiwan Apt study group (Co 60) should have very interesting comments on this non-intuitive declaration that the body survives better when there is not time for its defenses to mitigate harm. (Jeremy, could you forward this to them - my computer has been freakishly "recovered' and lost them.)
I sunbath for 10 min a day (when I can) but would promptly be done in by 300 min. at a time.
Perhaps factors like longer smoking time or longer mine dust exposure accounts for this.
Howard Long
----- Original Message -----
From: blreider at aol.com
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:05:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] protraction enhancement effect
"for equal total dose, a greater risk is incurred by those whose total dose is accumulated at a lower rate over a longer duration than at a higher rate over a shorter duration."
http://www3.cancer.gov/intra/dce-old/pdfs/reumid.pdf
Barbara Reider, CHP
http://www3.cancer.gov/intra/dce-old/pdfs/reumid.pdf
Barbara Reider, CHP
-----Original Message-----
From: Brennan, Mike (DOH) (DOH) <Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2010 2:28 pm
Subject: [ RadSafe ] protraction enhancement effect
Has anyone heard of "protraction enhancement effect", apparently also called
inverse exposure-rate effect"? I ran across it in an ICRP document, and I just
ant to see if other, more knowledgeable people think it means what I think it
eans.
______________________________________________
ou are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
adSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
ttp://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list