[ RadSafe ] [ RadSafe Yucca Mtn.

Mon Sep 20 15:02:09 CDT 2010

Jerry,

Your gross oversimplification of what to do about the nuclear wastes
currently located at 129 sites in 39 states, which includes more than 70
commercial nuclear reactor sites, 43 research sites, and ten Department
of Energy (DoE) sites indicates that you may not have full appreciation
of the magnitude of the problem.  Radioactive waste disposal is a topic
which dates back to the 1950s, when the National Academy of Sciences
started the initial search for a nuclear waste disposal site.  

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA, P.L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2201
)recognizes that the federal government has the primary responsibility
for permanent radwaste disposal, as well as the important participatory
roles of the states and the public.  Various agencies within the federal
government predicted (decades ago) that the site selection process and
the construction would likely be controversial because there are so many
entities involved (Sec DoE, Congress, the President, the states, Native
American Tribes, and the general public).  Political posturing and
anti-nuclear activism haven't made the undertaking any less complicated
or less expensive.  Democracies can be oftentimes be rather messy, but
that doesn't mean we should yearn for dictatorships, does it?

-A.J.

A.J. Teachout
Chief, Health Physics Division
Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bldg. 42
Bethesda, MD  20889-5603
Voice:  (301) 295.1285
Facsimile:  (301) 295.6567
Teachout at afrri.usuhs.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jerry Cohen
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:22 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [ RadSafe Yucca Mtn.

I have always opposed the Yucca Mountain project! This is not because of
any 
inherent health or environmental risk, but simply because the problem is
not 
that dangerous  or complicated to begin with. I am sickened by the
squandering 
of $20 Billion in hopes of gaining public acceptance. If anything, this 
expenditure has predictably been counter-productive. Just another
example of 
government in action.
Jerry Cohen

________________________________
From: "Hunter, Jeffrey L" <Jeffrey_L_Hunter at RL.gov>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List

<radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 10:53:54 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear
Waste 
Site

Jeff,

You know better than that.  

Jeff Hunter
Hanford ALARA Center
Mission Support Alliance
P.O. Box 650, MSIN SO-19
Richland, WA  99352
(509) 373-0656, Office
(509) 308-5627, Cell

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu 
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Kulp, Jeffrey B
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:13 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear
Waste 
Site

I am somewhat confused; Ms. Haley is slamming Sen. Reid because he does
not want Nevada to become the "dumping ground" for America's nuclear
waste. Her concern is that South Carolina will become a "permanent
dumping ground" for America's nuclear waste. If the east coast had been
able to come up with a viable long term storage area for nuclear
materials, they wouldn't have to worry about sending it to somebody
else's area of the country. Sounds like NIMBY-ism to me

Jeff Kulp
Washington State University
Radiation Safety Office
Pullman, WA 99164-1302
(509) 335-8175

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Perle, Sandy
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:44 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear Waste
Site

Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear Waste Site
September 19, 2010

(AP) South Carolina gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley is launching a
new attack-- calling out Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for wasting
billions of dollars by preventing the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste
repository from going online.

Haley, whose state contains two nuclear waste processing sites, said $20
billion already has been spent on the facility 100 miles north of Las
Vegas, including $1.2 billion from South Carolina.

"President Obama and Harry Reid are willing to shut down Yucca and make
South Carolina a permanent dumping ground to save Harry Reid's Senate
seat. That's wrong," Haley said in a statement issued Saturday night.

"We are not interested in investing in any more Nevada real estate when
we get nothing in return. If the feds want to renege on the promise to
keep Yucca open, they must refund the $1.2 billion our state has spent
on the facility. We want our money back," she said.

Reid has made shutting down development of Yucca one of his priorities,
and successfully lobbied the Obama administration to prevent licensing
of the site, which Congress approved in 2002 as the nation's only deep
earth, geologically safe disposal facility.

"Hell no, that won't happen," Reid told the Las Vegas Journal-Review on
Saturday about continuing to develop the Yucca site. "Nevada is not the
nation's dumping ground and it never will be as long as I have something
to say about it."

President Obama has created the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's
Nuclear Future, led by Congressman Lee Hamilton and General Brent
Scowcroft, to look for alternative locations for disposal and recycling
of nuclear fuel.

In March, the Department of Energy asked that its application for a
license with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build the repository
be pulled with prejudice. A subcommittee of the NRC refused the request,
and in a decision expected soon the NRC could announce it will bar a
withdraw of the application. That would enable it to move to deny the
license, effectively sealing off the site, a decision that will likely
lead to a lawsuit in federal court.

On Thursday, while touring the Savannah River nuclear waste disposal
site in South Carolina, Haley said she wants to pursue a coalition of
governors to pressure the administration to continue development of
Yucca.

Unfortunately for Haley, if elected her term would not overlap with
like-minded Republican Connecticut Gov. Jodi Rell. Rell, who announced
she is retiring this year, sent a letter to Energy Secretary Stephen Chu
this month requesting that Yucca continue to be developed.

"DOE has spent decades and billions of dollars investigating the
suitability of Yucca Mountain as a geologic repository, determined in
2002 that Yucca Mountain was a suitable location, and even now concedes
that its Yucca Mountain application is neither flawed nor the site
unsafe," Rell wrote to Chu, according to Sunday's New Haven Register.

"To now reverse developing Yucca Mountain as a permanent storage site as
a matter of policy is a disservice to Connecticut rate payers, who
continue to be burdened by DOE's delay in proceeding with its license
application."

Connecticut has two nuclear power plants storing spent fuel rods.
Connecticut gubernatorial candidates -- Republican Tom Foley and
Democrat Dan Malloy -- have not weighed in on the Yucca site. However,
Haley's Democratic opponent Vincent Sheheen has reportedly agreed with
Haley about pursuing the Nevada waste facility.
____________________
Sander C. Perle
President
Mirion Technologies
Dosimetry Services Division
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
+1 (949) 296-1144 (Fax)

Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE:   This e-mail message and all
attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the
addressee and may contain proprietary information of Mirion Technologies
and/or its affiliates.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, delete the
original message and all attachments from your computer, and destroy any
copies you may have made.  Thank you.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu