[ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano and Colleagues
C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
Tue Apr 19 05:54:19 CDT 2011
I just copied the citations using the different methods for citing, in case you needed them. What I dont see from you or anyone else is any scientific argument about the issue. Why is that? Is it because there is none. And if there is none, then it is a falsification of your model.
Its all gone quiet over there except for one guy talking about hormesis. I can deal with hormesis, but lets stay with this paper on infant leukemia. If you cannot explain these findings, your ICRP model is dead in the water.
I am not asking for a list of papers that support your model. In science, one reasearch result which falsifies a model is enough.
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Fri 15/04/2011 03:03
To: Richard D. Urban Jr.; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano and Colleagues
Yes, what's with this? You cite your own literary
production three times?
When I asked for citations I meant to different papers, not
to the same one three times.
At 10:23 AM 4/14/2011, you wrote:
>Where are the "hundreds' of peer reviewed papers?
>I count one, two, thr... oh wait... these are citations of the SAME
>paper from the SAME issue of the open journal... ONE which has had
>FEWER than 2200 total views, both abstract and full since
>publication 2 years ago.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe