[ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano and Colleagues
C.Busby at ulster.ac.uk
Wed Apr 20 06:14:45 CDT 2011
Point me to Michael Ruse (good name)
Ill check it out.
You obviously know little or nothing about the philosophy of Science.
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Wed 20/04/2011 03:22
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute Mangano and Colleagues
There has been no "scientific argument" because you have not
posted the text of your literary production. We can't argue with thin air.
I rather doubt that you know more about health physics and
epidemiology than does the ICRP.
You wrote, "In science, one reasearch [sic] result which
falsifies a model is enough." This is not so. You have obviously
never read anything by Michael Ruse.
At 04:54 AM 4/19/2011, you wrote:
>I just copied the citations using the different methods for citing,
>in case you needed them. What I dont see from you or anyone else is
>any scientific argument about the issue. Why is that? Is it because
>there is none. And if there is none, then it is a falsification of your model.
>Its all gone quiet over there except for one guy talking about
>hormesis. I can deal with hormesis, but lets stay with this paper on
>infant leukemia. If you cannot explain these findings, your ICRP
>model is dead in the water.
>I am not asking for a list of papers that support your model. In
>science, one reasearch result which falsifies a model is enough.
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
>Sent: Fri 15/04/2011 03:03
>To: Richard D. Urban Jr.; The International Radiation Protection
>(Health Physics) Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Developing Body of Evidence to Refute
>Mangano and Colleagues
> Yes, what's with this? You cite your own literary
>production three times?
> When I asked for citations I meant to different papers, not
>to the same one three times.
>At 10:23 AM 4/14/2011, you wrote:
> >Where are the "hundreds' of peer reviewed papers?
> >I count one, two, thr... oh wait... these are citations of the SAME
> >paper from the SAME issue of the open journal... ONE which has had
> >FEWER than 2200 total views, both abstract and full since
> >publication 2 years ago.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe