[ RadSafe ] FW: ...detection (BUSBY)

[Cowie, Michael I]

I think it is safe to say ( without any assumption) that Chris does not understand the process of representative air sampling.

Mike

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 8, 2011, at 11:11 PM, "franz.schoenhofer at chello.at" <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at> wrote:

> Cindy,
>
> I share your concerns insofar, that they are well defined. What I wonder is why this well known antinuclear activist is getting so much bandwidth on RADSAFE with his ridiculous "scientific" results. One should disregard them completely, even if this would  be regarded by some funny antinuclear groups be regarded as "politically incorrect".
>
> I recommend to ignore those absurd messages.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Franz
>
>
>
> From: "Chris Busby" <C.Busby at ulster.ac. uk >
> To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" < radsafe @ agni .phys. iit . edu >, "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" < radsafe @ agni .phys. iit . edu >, "Richard D. Urban Jr." < radmax @ earthlink .net>, "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" < radsafe @ agni .phys. iit . edu >
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 1:09:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW : Reporter's question about lower         limitsof         detection (BUSBY)
>
>
> Dear Mike,
> No
> It would be the activity Bq .
> It is the filter that we need to know the radioactivity content of since that is what the air passes through.
> The activity concentration i.e. Bq /kg would be of no utility whatever.
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe -bounces@ agni .phys. iit . edu on behalf of Cowie , Michael I
> Sent: Mon 08/08/2011 13:16
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing        List; Richard D. Urban Jr.; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing        List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW : Reporter's question about lower limitsof         detection (BUSBY)
>
> Trying to remain civil Chris, if I accept all your "assumptions" would it not be the activity concentration that would be higher and not the activity?
>
> Mike
>
> -----
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

________________________________

The contents of this email, including all related responses, files and attachments transmitted with it (collectively referred to as “this Email”), are intended solely for the use of the individual/entity to whom/which they are addressed, and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. This Email may not be disclosed or forwarded to anyone else without authorization from the originator of this Email. If you have received this Email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies from your system. Please note that the views or opinions presented in this Email are those of the author and may not necessarily represent those of Saudi Aramco. The recipient should check this Email and any attachments for the presence of any viruses. Saudi Aramco accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus/error transmitted by this Email.