[ RadSafe ] Collective Dose and colorimetric dosimeters
jjc105 at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 11 12:08:37 CST 2011
The concept of collective dose may be administratively convenient, but unless
one accepts LNT as scientifically valid, the whole idea is nonsense. For
example, take two situations where 1000 man-rem are received. In the first, one
person receives a 1000 rem dose, in the second, one million people each receive
a 1.0 mrem dose. Both cases result in 1000 man-rem. Is the harm done equivalent?
I think not.
From: "Perle, Sandy" <SPerle at mirion.com>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Tue, January 11, 2011 9:05:28 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Collective Dose and colorimetric dosimeters
Having worked with the colorimetric dosimeters, I concur that they are not
sensitive enough to be useful at doses less than several rem (perhaps 50 mSv).
These should not be used by individuals who require knowledge of their dose, and
a standard passive or active dosimeter should be worn and dose documented. The
usefulness of a colorimetric dosimeter is solely if one wants to use the device
as a go/no-go high dose potential, where the individual can then leave the area,
waiting for support from knowledgeable responders who have the appropriate
monitoring equipment. Another significant issue with a colorimetric dosimeter is
the lower the dose threshold, the shorter the shelf-life, as well as being
affected by other environmental influence factors.
Sander C. Perle
Dosimetry Services Division
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
+1 (949) 296-1130 (Fax)
Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of ??? ???
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:20 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Collective Dose and colorimetric dosimeters
I agree with Bill and will be happy to get comments on a similar issue:
Subject: Hospital preparedness to radiological emergencies, either accidents or
terror, not nuclear.
I believe all will agree that hospital first receivers should be monitored to
I hope too all will agree that the majority of them, or a great number, are not
"radiation workers", hence are "members of the public" regarding doses.
Colorimetric dosimeters are now on the market (RADview, SIRAD) and are much
chipper the EPDs. So there is a tendency to purchase them instead of EPAs.
Question: Hospital first receiver's possible exposure may be much lowers then
that of first responders acting on the scene - true or false?
If true, then since colorimetric badges are not sensitive do doses smaller the
several rems, do not give dose rate indication or alarm, and that there is no
way to learn exact dose, there is a need of a better measuring unit.
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments
transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain
proprietary information of Mirion Technologies and/or its affiliates. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, delete the
original message and all attachments from your computer, and destroy any copies
you may have made. Thank you.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
More information about the RadSafe