[ RadSafe ] Sternglass => Mangano scaremongering =>was:RE:Sci.Am. about Fukushima and US Pacific NW infant mortality

[Busby, Chris]

Are we allowed to use wikipedia as a source?
Dont believe its peer reviewed. I mean my own entry changes by the day as any person can (and does) hack into me. I have not changed anything in my entry in Wikipedia, it is a kind of battlefield.
I mean, I could start using www.llrc.org or www.greenaudit.org, or www.euradcom.org or www.bsrrw.org as references.
For myself i dont really mind but if we are having rules about assertioons and citations then maybe there should be some guidelines. 
Moderator?
Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Steven Dapra
Sent: Sun 10/07/2011 22:44
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Sternglass => Mangano scaremongering =>was:RE:Sci.Am. about Fukushima and US Pacific NW infant	mortality
 
July 10

	Wikipedia's entry on Sternglass is revealing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Sternglass

	In particular, read "Critical Responses" (for Alice Stewart's 
comments of an aspect of Sternglass), and "Three  Mile Island," for 
other criticisms (including one from Arthur Tamplin, of all people).

	On July 7th I wrote that over this weekend I would examine some 1969 
proceedings at Hanford where Sternglass, spoke and report to RADSAFE 
on what he said.  For reasons beyond my control it will be sometime 
this week before I can make good on this.

Steven Dapra

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu