[ RadSafe ] LFluorideThoriumReactor -pitch in WSJ

Franta, Jaroslav frantaj at aecl.ca
Thu Jun 2 13:26:24 CDT 2011


It’s a good pitch.

Certainly the potential is there.

Of course the article glosses over an awful lot of details, and doesn't even mention that there is an endless variety of possible designs based on the same basic theme (or closely related).

But in general, the problems facing any developers are likely to be greater on the legal & regulatory side, than on the technical side: the US system currently just isn't set up to deal with anything other than LWRs.


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Howard
Sent: June 2, 2011 1:09 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Cc: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
Subject: [ RadSafe ] LFluorideThoriumReactor -pitch in WSJ

Please comment on this by Michael Conley in WSJ today.
Howard Long

Cucumbers have killed more people in Germany than nuclear power ever has.

Fukushima was awful, but nuclear power isn't the problem. The problem is with the reactors we've been using to produce it. If the reactors at Fukushima had been Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTRs) they wouldn’t have had a disaster on their hands.

Liquid-fuel reactor technology was successfully developed at Oak Ridge National Labs in the 1960s. Although the test reactor worked flawlessly, the project was shelved, a victim of Cold War strategy. But LFTRs have been gathering a lot of attention lately, particularly since the events in Japan.

A LFTR is a completely different type of reactor. For one thing, it can't melt down. It's physically impossible. And since it’s air-cooled, it doesn’t have to be located near the shore. It can even be placed in an underground vault. A tsunami would roll right over it, like a truck over a manhole cover. 

Imagine a kettle of lava that never boils. A LFTR uses liquid fuel - nuclear material dissolved in molten fluoride salt. Conventional reactors are atomic pressure cookers, using solid fuel rods to super-heat water. And that means the constant possibility of high-pressure ruptures and steam leaks. 

LFTRs don’t even use water. Instead, they heat a common gas like CO2 to spin a turbine for generating power. So if a LFTR leaks, it’s not a catastrophe. The molten salt will "pool and cool" just like lava, for easy containment, recovery, and re-use. 

LFTRs burn Thorium, a mildly radioactive material as common as tin and found all over the world. We’ve already mined enough raw Thorium to power the country for 400 years. It’s the waste at our Rare Earth Element mines.

LFTRs consume fuel so efficiently that they can even use the spent fuel from other reactors, while producing a miniscule amount of waste themselves. In fact, the waste from a LFTR reverts to background radiation levels in just 300 years. (No, that’s not a typo.) Yucca Mountain is obsolete. So are Uranium reactors.

LFTR technology has been sitting on the shelf at Oak Ridge for over forty years. But now the manuals are dusted off, and a dedicated group of nuclear industry outsiders is ready to build another test reactor and give it a go. 

Will it work? If it doesn’t, we’ll have one more reactor to retire. But if it does work - and there is every reason to believe that it will - the LFTR will launch a new global paradigm of clean, cheap, safe and abundant energy.

Let’s build one and see. 

You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

This e-mail, and any attachments, may contain information that
is confidential, subject to copyright, or exempt from disclosure.
Any unauthorized review, disclosure, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of or reliance on this information 
may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited.  


Le présent courriel, et toute pièce jointe, peut contenir de 
l'information qui est confidentielle, régie par les droits 
d'auteur, ou interdite de divulgation. Tout examen, 
divulgation, retransmission, diffusion ou autres utilisations 
non autorisées de l'information ou dépendance non autorisée 
envers celle-ci peut être illégale et est strictement interdite.

More information about the RadSafe mailing list