[ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use

[Steven Dapra]

June 4

         I wish I could induce someone to pay me to do research in a 
field where I know nothing.  NIce work, if you can get it.

         It so happens that background levels of exposure *are* 
harmless.  Why should any imagination be necessary to accept the truth?

         By the way, who are "we," and where is this "laboratory" located?

Steven Dapra


[edit]


>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Busby, Chris
>Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:46 AM
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>List; Radsafe
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use
>
>Dear Radsafers,
>
>I have been looking at this in between everything else since 1998 when I
>was funded by Children With Leukemia to do some reseacrh on the issue. I
>believe that the carcinogenic effects of RF. . . .

[edit]

>  We are currently examining
>this issue in the laboratory. It is odd that no one has thought of this.
>I suppose because you all imagine these background levels of exposure to
>be harmless.
>Chris
>
>________________________________
>
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Geo>K0FF
>Sent: Ot 2011.05.31. 18:28
>To: Radsafe
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use
>
>
>
>"WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/31/who.cell.phones/index.html
>
>according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile
>phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine
>exhaust and chloroform.
>
>Before its announcement Tuesday, WHO had assured consumers that no
>adverse health effects had been established.

[edit]