[ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use
sjd at swcp.com
Sat Jun 4 03:21:30 CDT 2011
I wish I could induce someone to pay me to do research in a
field where I know nothing. NIce work, if you can get it.
It so happens that background levels of exposure *are*
harmless. Why should any imagination be necessary to accept the truth?
By the way, who are "we," and where is this "laboratory" located?
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Busby, Chris
>Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:46 AM
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use
>I have been looking at this in between everything else since 1998 when I
>was funded by Children With Leukemia to do some reseacrh on the issue. I
>believe that the carcinogenic effects of RF. . . .
> We are currently examining
>this issue in the laboratory. It is odd that no one has thought of this.
>I suppose because you all imagine these background levels of exposure to
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Geo>K0FF
>Sent: Ot 2011.05.31. 18:28
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] WHO: Cell phone use
>"WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk
>according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile
>phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine
>exhaust and chloroform.
>Before its announcement Tuesday, WHO had assured consumers that no
>adverse health effects had been established.
More information about the RadSafe