[ RadSafe ] Radon: POWERFULLY associated with LESS lungcancer by B.Cohen
Brennan, Mike (DOH)
Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV
Thu Jun 16 14:14:22 CDT 2011
As I understand it, the loss of some of those labs were more a function
of management in their parent corporations wanting to shed units that
didn't help THIS quarter's bottom line (the one the managers were
getting their bonuses on), and that couldn't predict when they would
make their next scientific breakthrough.
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Terry
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:06 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Radon: POWERFULLY associated with LESS
lungcancer by B.Cohen
Remember that this is a relatively new phenomenon.
The unintended consequences of this change was the loss of the powerful
research labs like Bell Labs, Xerox PARC, RCA Labs, etc and the rise of
the National Laboratories.
Not sure if it was worth it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Brian Riely <brian.riely at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is that politics funds science, not vice versa.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
More information about the RadSafe