[ RadSafe ] What's a sievert?

[Marvin Resnikoff]

That dose, 10 chest x-rays, would be more like the acceptable yearly dose to the public, not workers.
M Resnikoff

--- On Wed, 3/16/11, sarah.stewart at boehringer-ingelheim.com <sarah.stewart at boehringer-ingelheim.com> wrote:

From: sarah.stewart at boehringer-ingelheim.com <sarah.stewart at boehringer-ingelheim.com>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] What's a sievert?
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011, 4:27 PM

The best explanation I have heard thus far from the media was from a radio
broadcast.  The expert (who I believe was a contributing editor to Scientific
American) compared the acceptable dose rate for Japanese radiation workers to
about 10 chest X-rays.  

  
Sincerely, 
Sarah Stewart 
Environmental Health & Safety 
Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
Ridgefield, CT 06877 
(203) 791-6493 


-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Cmtimmpe at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:06 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] What's a sievert?

With respect to Message 1 of March 16, the majority of the public has no  
idea what a 'sievert' is much less confusing micro and milli.  Few of the  
news items I have seen put the dosage information in context to 'normal  
background' or 'action levels' or health affecting levels along with the  
accompanying exposure times.  No wonder there is so much fear - the
explanations 
should be in simpler, layman language. As for the discussion  mentioned by 
Roger, where was that discussion?  
 
Christopher  M. Timm, PE
Vice President/Senior Project Manager
PECOS Management  Services, Inc.
505-323-8355 - phone
505-323-2028 - fax
505-238-8174 -  mobile  

 

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:04:22 -0400
From:  <edmond0033 at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] NHK Live
To: "'The  International Radiation Protection \(Health Physics\)
Mailing  List'"  <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>,
<GeigerCounterEnthusiasts at yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID:  <DC73985AD8FB45288D6EB4516FF91A14 at EdmondPC>
Content-Type: text/plain;  format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original

Unfortunately the Public and news people mistake  milli and micro for 
thousand and million respectively.

Ed  Baratta

-----Original Message----- 
From: Roger Helbig
Sent:  Wednesday, March 16, 2011 7:41 AM
To: 'The International Radiation Protection  (Health Physics) Mailing List' 
;  
GeigerCounterEnthusiasts at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ RadSafe ] NHK  Live

There was good explanation just on about difference between milli  and
microSieverts and showing comparable doses in addition to the  radiation
measurements at various distances from  Fukushima



Roger




_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu