[ RadSafe ] Detectability vs. Hazard ,uranium in peaches

Sat Mar 19 21:08:34 CDT 2011

Yes, I live in upstate South Carolina and we have some VERY high levels of
naturally occurring Uranium in well water in discreet locations in our
Greenville County. The activity is so high I wouldn't drink it - owed to
chemical properties for kidney deposition.  Come to think of it I might give
a sample of my well water to our Rad Chem instructor to do an analysis if he
has time. Come to think of it, I've never checked it for chemical analysis
either. Only been drinking it for 31 years.

A woman in one of my training classes recoiled in horror and screamed "I'm
pregnant" as I approached her with a 198,000 dpm I-129 disc source. I was
showing them that it was almost non-detectable with a Pancake GM, but was 20
some thousand cpm with a thin window NaI detector.

She would have REALLY been horrified if she knew just how radioactive she
already was. I told her we needed to talk and tried to explain it to her.
Her emotions didn't want to let her brain absorb it.  She was a technical
assistant and made her living in bio-tech. 

Had she known about bananas and Brazil nuts she probably would have given
them a wide berth in the local grocery store. ;=)

Larry Addis

While on a visit to the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Dr Merril 
Eisenbud recounted an instance in which uranium was found in peaches.
Initially, 
many felt that it came from a uranium enrichment plant operating nearby.
Later 
an enterprising person collected samples of the fruit from far away
California. 
Those peaches also contained trace amounts of uranium. More in peaches grown
in 
cultivated farms. The source was phosphatic fertilizers which contain
uranium!

Couple of years ago, an NGO found uranium in the hair samples of some
children 
in Punjab, India. She attributed it to nuclear power plants. The news got
wide 
publicity. My colleagues in BARC spent several man-hours tracking the
source. 
Water samples in different parts of India as in other countries contain
uranium. 
Actually the uranium content in hair of children were also not abnormally
high

An active NGO attributed it to the "uranium dust" from Afghanistan. They
were 
claiming that US used uranium tipped artillery in Afghanistan! 

Regards
Parthasarathy

________________________________
From: Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List 
<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Sun, 20 March, 2011 5:28:06
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Detectability vs. Hazard

    An almost unique property of radioactivity is that is that it is
detectable 
even in miniscule quantities. In this regard, it is interesting to review
the 
case of Mercury (Hg) in seawater. A few decades ago there was serious
concern 
about consuming seafood which was found to be "tainted" with Hg. Swordfish
was 
not being consumed and even canned tuna fish was viewed with alarm. This Hg 
contamination was considered the result of industrial pollution and Hg was
the 
cause of considerable concern. Government funding supported much funding to 
research the "problem" and people were worried.
    Rational assessment at the time revealed that the most ambitious
industrial 
activity and all of mankind's historical use of Hg could only account for a 
minute fraction of the total oceanic Hg inventory. So where did all of this
Hg 
come from? The obvious answer is that the Hg was always there. In the eons
since 

the earth was formed, the continuing hydrologic cycle caused rain to leach
Hg 
and other minerals from the land, carrying it via the  rivers to the ocean
where 

it remained and concentrated over all time. So, how was it that in the 60's
and 
70's there becaome so much concern. I think I know the reason. Some time
around 
the early 60's, atomic absorbtion (AA) analysis was developed and man was
able 
to detect miniscule concentrations of Hg which were previously undetectable.

Researches hyped the Hg problem to secure funding for further study, the
news 
media reported extensively on the threat,  and perception of the problem 
snowballed. Finally, they discovered a store of tuna fish that had been
canned 
in the early 20's, and found Hg concentrations similar to those that caused
the 
current alarm showing that oceanic Hg levels were pretty much always there. 
Despite this, a lot of people still remain concerned. Once you scare them,
it 
seems almost impossible to unscare them.
    I believe the moral of this story is that if we wish to diminish public
fear 

of radiation we should start by somehow desensitizing radiation detectors. 
Either that, or find a way of making people think more rationally.

Jerry Cohen

________________________________
From: "GEOelectronics at netscape.com" <GEOelectronics at netscape.com>
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Sat, March 19, 2011 3:47:00 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] I-131 in milk and activity on spinach around Fukushima

Dewey, from CNN-

"Tainted milk was found 30 kilometers (18 1/2 miles) from the plant and
spinach 
was collected as far as 100 kilometers (65 miles) to the south, almost
halfway 
to Tokyo."

and 
"Very small amounts -- far below the level of concern -- of radioactive
iodine 
were also detected in tap water in Tokyo and most prefectures near the
Fukushima 

Daiichi plant damaged by last week's monster earthquake and tsunami"

George Dowell

_____________________________________________________________
Netscape.  Just the Net You Need.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:

http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:

http://health.phys.iit.edu

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu