[ RadSafe ] xkcd: Relative Radiation Dose chart

[Ted de Castro]

Yes but - its like 1984 Newspeak ......

the Sv is defined as a risk based unit and is not only therefore not 
measurable BUT it is also a linear unit and starts at 0 and nano, pico 
and even femto prefixes are acceptable.  Therefore LNTH and the Sv 
define and validate each other.

On 3/21/2011 1:52 PM, Sandra Matzkin wrote:
> Yes, I am aware that this 100 mSv value is considered to be a 
> threshold above which the probability of cancer increases linearly 
> with dose. I believe it is based on epidemiological studies carried 
> out on some populations (Hiroshima and Mayak among them). However, I 
> cannot find out how these studies were conducted or which other 
> radiological exposed populations were analyzed.
>
> It would be interesting to see both LNT and non-LNT supporters' take 
> on this.
>
> Sandra
>
> At 05:28 PM 3/21/2011, you wrote:
>> Looking at his references,
>> http://j.mp/ek8QYy
>>
>> I see the following statement at the MIT site:
>>    The 100 millisievert level is roughly the point at which health
>> effects from radiation
>>    become more likely. Below this it is statistically difficult to
>> connect radiation
>>    dose to cancer rates, but above this the relationship starts to
>> become apparent.
>>
>> And at the NRC tritium page:
>>    Although high doses and high dose rates may cause cancer in humans
>> and genetic abnormalities
>>    in an embryo or fetus, public health data have not established the
>> occurrence of these health
>>    risks following exposure to low doses and low dose rates -  below
>> about 10,000 millirem (mrem).
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Cary Renquist
>> cary.renquist at ezag.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Sandra Matzkin
>> Sent: Monday, 21 March 2011 11:38
>> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] xkcd: Relative Radiation Dose chart
>>
>> About the assertion "Lowest one-year dose clearly linked to increased
>> cancer risk" (100 mSv), can anyone comment or provide references on
>> how this link was established?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sandra Matzkin
>> Radiation Transport
>> INVAP SE
>> Bariloche
>> Argentina
>>
>>
>> At 02:30 PM 3/21/2011, Yoss, Robert wrote:
>> >For a chuckle note the last lines at the bottom.
>> >
>> >Rob Yoss
>> >FMLH/MCW
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> >[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Cary Renquist
>> >Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:45 AM
>> >To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
>> >Subject: [ RadSafe ] xkcd: Relative Radiation Dose chart
>> >
>> >Surprised that nobody has pointed this out yet...
>> >
>> >http://j.mp/fklO6J
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Best regards,
>> >Cary
>> >
>> >---
>> >Cary Renquist
>> >crenquist at isotopeproducts.com or cary.renquist at ezag.com
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> >
>> >Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> >understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> >http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> >
>> >For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>> >settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> >
>> >Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> >understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> >http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> >
>> >For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>> >settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and 
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and 
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>