[ RadSafe ] Member of European Committee on Radiation Risk: 400, 000 Fuku cancers based on health studies after Chernobyl | The Nuclear Engineering Department At UC Berkeley

[Roger Helbig]

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2970

This is a good example of why it is necessary to hold charlatans like
Christopher Busby up to standards and carefully examine their work and
statements.  This is a post to the webpage for the UC Berkeley Nuclear
Engineering Department radiation monitoring laboratory by someone who
believes Busby's claim of 400,000 cancers resulting from Fukushima - Busby
and fellow charlatans like Leuren Moret use the power of YouTube to promote
their scientific-sounding false assertions.  The original paper about
Chernobyl that Busby got into the poorly reviewed (they claim peer review,
but don't make any real effort to exclude close colleagues from being the
reviewers) MDPI for-profit on-line journals (you want to publish an article,
they will create a journal and maybe even a special topic to fit and they
are referenced by PubMed) in Basel, Switzerland.  

I was drawn to this by a claim that Leuren Moret is a member of the World
Committee on Radiation Risk, which does not appear to even exist, but which
references the heavily Busby influenced European Committee on Radiation Risk
(that I understand is not recognized by the UK Society of Radiological
Protection or similar European counterparts) 

Member of European Committee on Radiation Risk: 400,000 Fuku cancers based
on health studies after Chernobyl

It is critical that we support the BRAWM sampling and be grateful for them
and their work.
 
But we cannot simply ignore the risks that some, like the european committee
on radiation risk, the physicians for social responsibility, and the
radiation and public health project are warning us about.
 
This disaster will affect the world with sickness and death for generations.
Some of that will be right here in the United States. 

I think the analysis by this member of the European Committee on Radiation
Risk in this video is accurate and I challenge anyone on the BRAWM team to
say that it is wrong or explain why they believe it is inaccurate or an
unjustified analysis.
 
< Eggs "pack date" code Okay... I'm throwing the BS flag on this. Anyone
disagree? [by R. Cromack] >.


link to ECRR interview (with original post )

Submitted by Bill (not verified) on Thu, 2011-04-14 04:41.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0H-mtsdsgg&feature=player_embedded
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0H-mtsdsgg&feature=player_embedded#at=15
 
Let me start by saying this:
 
I TRUST the European Committee on Radiation Risk model for assessing the
likelihood of cancers based on their research of Chernobyl and global
contamination since the beginning of the nuclear age.
 
Today the World Halth Organization said we need to have HOURLY monitoring of
the situation in Japan and that we will have NO GOOD IDEA what the
consequences will be for at least 20 years.
 
Since some cancers and cancer deaths take more than 20 years to even emerge,
it seems the real consequences may not be known for a generation.
 
BRAWM's tests are critical components of the research to come for the next
generation to see exactly what harm there is from socalled low doses as well
as the higher ones ion Japan.
 
I myself believe based on research and experience and many years of studying
and following these issues, that we will begin to seIt is critical that we
support the BRAWM sampling and be grateful for them and their work.
 
But we cannot simply ignore the risks that some, like the european committee
on radiation risk, the physicians for social responsibility, and the
radiation and public health project are warning us about.
 
This disaster will affect the world with sickness and death for generations.
Some of that will be right here in the United States. 

I think the analysis by a member of the European Committee on Radiation Risk
in this video is accurate and I challenge anyone on the BRAWM team to say
that it is wrong or explain why they believe it is inaccurate or an
unjustified analysis.
 
e spikes in spontaneous abortions and infant mortality and birth defects.
Certainly in Japan but also right here in the United States where the levels
are above "normal" background. Child Leukemia will follow infant mortality
in spiking and then thyroid cancers in a few years then organ and bone
cancer spikes, including adult leukemia.