[ RadSafe ] The human sex odds at birth after theatmosphericatomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Fri May 27 20:23:45 CDT 2011

May 27

         By this line of "reasoning," I too have the same status as 
the ECRR and the ICRP --- I also am independent.

         Since you, Chris Busby, are so hot to learn about funding 
sources, why don't you tell who funds you and your fellow 
travelers?  Over the past 30 - 35 years I have met any number of 
people like you.  As a class you like to brag about how you are not 
materialistic.  At the same time, all you want to talk about is who 
is getting money, how much he is getting, and from whom he is receiving it.

         With respect to the infant leukemias, what kind of 
explanation would you accept?  Will you accept anything from anyone on RADSAFE?

Steven Dapra

At 02:00 PM 5/27/2011, you wrote:
>But the ECRR and the ICRP have exactly the same status. Can it be 
>that you guys dont know this?
>They are both supposed to be independent.
>But just ask ICRP who funds it.
>It wont tell you.
>ICRP has no official status. This is what its secretary Jack 
>Valentin told us at a meeting in the European Parliament in 1997. He 
>said, the European Parliament is free to consult any organisation 
>for its advice.
>I still havent had any sensible explanation of the infant leukemias.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Ted de Castro
>Sent: Fri 27/05/2011 18:45
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] The human sex odds at birth after 
>theatmosphericatomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the 
>vicinity of nuclear facilities
>Thanks Franz for the contextual insight/clarification/perspective on the
>appellation "commission".
>On 5/27/2011 9:34 AM, franz.schoenhofer at chello.at wrote:
> > Given the fact that ECRR is bogus - "European Commission" is 
> something else and a regulatory body within the European Community 
> contrary to your (Busby) private "company".  Eerything distributed 
> by you on behalf of ECCR is automatically bogus and financed by 
> some green groups, radical antinuclear groups like this 
> international financial enterprise "Greenpeace" and others you 
> might be surprised or not that your message is not taken serious. 
> Since RADSAFE has unfortunately become almost a US-alone newsgroup 
> you might find a willing audience, which takes you serious - we in 
> Europe know, what we have to think of you and your fellow "experts" 
> like this unbelievable expert "Schmitz-Feuerhake", on whose name, 
> when mentioned among European radiation protection professionals 
> causes a laugh - she is really ridiculous, has been removed as a 
> presentator from conferences, especially since her "coauthors" 
> refused to be named together with her, because they did not share 
> her opinions. She
>   i
> >   s like Chris Busby a member of those "commissions", 
> "Societies", "Institutes", which do not have any legal status, but 
> use these labels only to give their agenda a credibility and to 
> enhance donations. How dispisable!
> >
> > There is more material for the future!
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Franz


More information about the RadSafe mailing list