[ RadSafe ] deactivated nukes

Wed Oct 12 11:52:53 CDT 2011

I read about that.  Something that I found interesting is that the 24th
Air Force, the overall command for that piece of the Air Force, found
out about the virus through the news, which is not the desired channel
for such things.  

On the other hand, the weapons I was familiar with "in the day" were not
susceptible to software viruses, as they really didn't have software by
today's standards.  They had very, very few inputs, which I actually
will not discus, beyond again expressing doubt that UFOs could
"deactivate" them. 

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Perle, Sandy
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 9:41 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] deactivated nukes

Mike, and now we have an issue, Virus infects U.S. military drones.
Guess
this has been going on for about 2 weeks and every time the wipe the
virus
off the systems, it reappears. Interesting if the US Military can't keep
a
virus from their systems, can you imagine the damage that can be done to
the world's economy if larger targets are affected!

Regards,

Sandy

-----------------------------------
Sander C. Perle
President
Mirion Technologies
Dosimetry Services Division
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
+1 (949) 296-1130 (Fax)

Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/

On 10/12/11 9:29 AM, "Brennan, Mike  (DOH)" <Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV>
wrote:

>Hi, James.
>
>I would go with your initial impulse on this.  Maybe the UFOs didn't
>think submarines were worth bothering with, but as someone who was at
>that end of the strategic weapons biz, I am pretty sure if someone was
>messing with our nukes from the outside, there would have been a memo.
>I am not even sure what "deactivated" means in this context, as
warheads
>are not kept energized all the time (it wears on the electronics), but
>are powered up when the missile is "spun-up" (though I admit that other
>systems may work differently).  Additionally, it would show gross
>incompetence on the part of those operating the UFOs to temporarily
>"deactivate" some weapons, rather than permanently taking out all of
>them.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of James Salsman
>Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:16 PM
>To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] deactivated nukes
>
>Since Franz thinks my opinion about underground nuclear testing
>matters, I thought I would ask a related question which may seem
>esoteric at first, but the actual question concerns confidential
>decision support.
>
>Today I received in the mail a 600+ page book, "UFOs and Nukes" by
>Robert Hastings (2008.) Normally I would dismiss any credulous book
>about UFOs, but this one includes documentation of more than 120
>military officers who say that they witnessed nuclear weapons
>unexpectedly deactivated in missile silos in the US and USSR during
>the Cold War, coincident with the observations UFOs being sighted
>above ground at the corresponding missile bases within a minute of the
>deactivations.  Not only have the USAF and Soviet officers confirmed
>their statements for the book, but seven of the USAF officer they went
>in front of the National Press Club last November.  Their are videos
>at http://ufohastings.com and more information at
>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/28/national/main6907702.shtml
>and http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/tag/robert-hastings/
>
>More than 30% of the population of the US believes that
>extraterrestrials have visited the Earth (if that seems high, consider
>that a majority of the US believes angels currently visit the Earth.)
>I would like to know the corresponding figure for health physicists,
>but only if the survey was confidential.  Are there any precedents or
>available facilities for confidential surveys of the Health Physics
>Society?
>
>Sincerely,
>James Salsman
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE:   This e-mail message and all
attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the
addressee and may contain proprietary information of Mirion Technologies
and/or its affiliates.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, delete the
original message and all attachments from your computer, and destroy any
copies you may have made.  Thank you.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu