[ RadSafe ] DU not toxicologically identical to non D-U

[Bob Cherry]

<< he made statements to federal officials on  the health aspects of uranium
fume inhalation >>

Jimmy, 

Exactly when and where did I make these statements to anyone? Reference,
please. Until you provide a valid reference or retract your assertion, you
are lying about it.

Bob C

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of StevenFrey at aol.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:18 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] DU not toxicologically identical to non D-U

Dear RADSAFE Moderator, 
 
What will it take to warrant removal of the below poster from this  board? 
First he refuses to identify his true name to other board  members. Then he
tried to compromise another RADSAFER's  employment, and now we see his wish
for use of the criminal  justice system against yet another RADSAFER. 
 
The longer this abusive use of RADSAFE is allowed to continue, other
RADSAFERs are going to be less inclined to participate.
 
Steve
 
In a message dated 10/31/2011 1:35:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jsalsman at gmail.com writes:
 
Mark  Sonter wrote:

> DU *must* be toxicologically identical to non  D-U.

That is not consistent with the translocation graph shown in  the Gmelin
Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry, 8th Edition,  English translation
(Springer-Verlag, 1982), Title U -- Uranium,  Supplemental Volume A7 --
Biology, Section 3 -- Metabolism: Absorption,  page 305, Figure 3-1,
"Retention and translocation of inhaled uranyl  nitrate,"
from J.E. Ballou, R.A. Gies, and N.A. Wagman in BNWL-2500, Part  1, pp.
379-380 (1978.)

If I owe Bob Cherry an apology for not  knowing about genotoxicity when he
made statements to federal officials on  the health aspects of uranium fume
inhalation, or for getting his title  wrong, then I apologize.  I remain of
the opinion that a more  appropriate title would involve a Quantico detainee
number for decades  followed by "Defendant" in a medical expense loss
recovery class action  suit, and I appreciate all the work the military does
to defend my right  to express such opinions.

Sincerely,
James  Salsman
_______________________________________________
You are  currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a  message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules.  These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For  information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit:  http://health.phys.iit.edu

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu