[ RadSafe ] Legal Complaint of Navy Sailors
Ted de Castro
tdc at xrayted.com
Sun Dec 30 12:42:24 CST 2012
He doesn't have to convince the HPS - just 12 people who couldn't figure
a way out of jury duty and are used to making decisions based on sound
bites and knee jerk emotional reactions!
As little as he knows - The jurors will know far less - and any
potential juror who shows any hint of knowing anything more and/or not
fitting the profile above - will be rejected.
In other words - looks like his case/arguments are right on track - he
seems to know what he's doing.
On 12/30/2012 2:16 AM, Roger Helbig wrote:
> The lawyer could use a lot more education. In addition to citing such
> eminent experts as Ernest Sternglass and Arnold Gundersen and using
> ENENews as if it were a peer reviewed scientific publication instead
> of an on-line anti-nuclear screed, he makes the following statement on
> page 8 of the complaint:
> "39. Radiation does not readily break down and biodegrade in the
> ground or water or apparatus exposed to it. Research now shows that
> it will persist in the environment for decades, since it has a
> half-life in excess of 77 years, far longer than the life expectancy
> of humans exposed to it."
> This makes it pretty clear that this hot shot lawyer does not have a
> clue what he is talking about.
> Roger Helbig
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe