[ RadSafe ] Doing science
jjc105 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 20:19:43 CDT 2012
I certainly with you and Maury. Additionally, Partridge's paper
gives excellent insight on how not to do science. Despite temptations to do so,
one should not make tenous assumptions , and then subject them to extensive and
elaborate calculations. No matter how detailed and elaborate the model applied,
the good old GIGO [garbage in, garbage out] still applies.
From: Peter Miller <z3ix at kamprint.com>
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Tue, June 26, 2012 5:16:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 1003, Issue 1
Thanks Maury for an excellent review of the current state of climate so-called
> This essay (click on link below) by Paltridge affords one
> of the best perspectives on Science and Climate that I've ever seen.
> I hope many of you will find it equally so.
Among many other virtues, the article illustrates the process of relativistic
nonsense migrating from the arts and humanities into the sciences.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
More information about the RadSafe