[ RadSafe ] Doing science

Jerry Cohen jjc105 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 20:19:43 CDT 2012


Peter, 
    I certainly with you and Maury. Additionally, Partridge's paper 
gives excellent insight on how not to do science. Despite temptations to do so, 
one should not make tenous assumptions , and then subject them to extensive and 
elaborate calculations. No matter how detailed and elaborate the model applied, 
the good old GIGO [garbage in, garbage out] still applies.

Jerry Cohen





________________________________
From: Peter Miller <z3ix at kamprint.com>
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Tue, June 26, 2012 5:16:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 1003, Issue 1

Thanks Maury for an excellent review of the current state of climate so-called 
science.

> This essay (click on link below) by Paltridge affords one 
> of the best perspectives on Science and Climate that I've ever seen.
>
> I hope many of you will find it equally so.

http://afr.com/p/lifestyle/review/science_held_hostage_in_climate_Uamwgc7zXEsU6RbQJ5MWIJ


Among many other virtues, the article illustrates the process of relativistic 
nonsense migrating from the arts and humanities into the sciences.

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu


More information about the RadSafe mailing list