[ RadSafe ] Doing science
Jerry Cohen
jjc105 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 20:19:43 CDT 2012
Peter,
I certainly with you and Maury. Additionally, Partridge's paper
gives excellent insight on how not to do science. Despite temptations to do so,
one should not make tenous assumptions , and then subject them to extensive and
elaborate calculations. No matter how detailed and elaborate the model applied,
the good old GIGO [garbage in, garbage out] still applies.
Jerry Cohen
________________________________
From: Peter Miller <z3ix at kamprint.com>
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Tue, June 26, 2012 5:16:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 1003, Issue 1
Thanks Maury for an excellent review of the current state of climate so-called
science.
> This essay (click on link below) by Paltridge affords one
> of the best perspectives on Science and Climate that I've ever seen.
>
> I hope many of you will find it equally so.
http://afr.com/p/lifestyle/review/science_held_hostage_in_climate_Uamwgc7zXEsU6RbQJ5MWIJ
Among many other virtues, the article illustrates the process of relativistic
nonsense migrating from the arts and humanities into the sciences.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list