[ RadSafe ] Aftermath of Fukishima - Thousands of Deaths Preventable by H...
JPreisig at aol.com
JPreisig at aol.com
Tue Oct 16 14:32:03 CDT 2012
Dr. Long, Radsafe,
Japan is a special situation. It is a set of small islands which are
quite seismically active.
The placement of very large (global scale subduction) faults in close
proximity to the islands make
tsunami risks and loss-of-life quite real. Japan doesn't have all that
much available farmland.
One bad nuclear accident and companion tsunami has harmed a fair chunk of
They are deciding to phase out nuclear power. It makes good sense for
The are many places on Earth for which Nuclear Power is a very viable
Most of the USA is a great place for nuclear power.
Have a good week...
Joseph R. (Joe) Preisig, PhD
In a message dated 10/16/2012 3:23:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
howard.long at comcast.net writes:
Your conference on Radiation Hormesis, Health Physics, May, 1987,
(which I just pulled out of the file by my desk)
is updated by Dr Orient's one page on
The Aftermath of Fukishima in Civil Defense Perspectives (Google).
It gives enough info. to write and speak on (headings):
The Harm of Over-reaction
Consistent, Meaningful Doses
Establishing a Rational Evacuation Standard
You-all can best respond to fear mongers who question your very existence!
"Should Japan, and the world, totally give up on nuclear energy (Nature
Howard Long, Family Doctor, Doctors for Disaster Preparedness Board Member
On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are you suggesting that the way to deal with a blunder (LNT)
> is to ignore and/or perpetuate it?
> Jerry Cohen
> From: Howard Long <howard.long at comcast.net>
> To: The Protection MailingList International Radiation
> <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Cc: Orient Jane <janeorientmd at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tue, October 16, 2012 9:38:53 AM
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Aftermath of Fukishima - Thousands of Deaths
> Health Physicists!
> This concise page of technical and political data ends with,
> " If we were, however, to admit that low-dose radiation is not only safe
> might cure cancer and prevent birth defects, what would happen to
> payments to people irradiated at Hiroshima or Chernobyl, or the
> health physicists?
> Health physicists have a duty to save thousands of lives from
> Japan, now.
> Who will raise the voice of science to discredit the fearmongers?
> This page prepares you:
> Google : Civil Defense Perspectives Sept 2012
> Howard Long
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
More information about the RadSafe