[ RadSafe ] outdoor low dose rate measurements
radbloom at comcast.net
radbloom at comcast.net
Wed Apr 3 14:53:15 CDT 2013
John,
We used to report most of our measurements as < 0.05 mR/h , or <0.05 mrad/h because the meters and detectors we used fluctuated significantly bel ow this tick mark. I strongly suggest walking around with your survey meter to see if you can easily discern the levels you want your user to see. What kind of meter/detector will be used?
Good luck.
Cindy
----- Original Message -----
From: "JOHN RICH" <JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com>
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 3:39:15 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] outdoor low dose rate measurements
Radsafers
I just finished a calculation that's going to require a minimally trained
individual (not a radworker) to notice the difference between 0.03
mrad/hr and 0.13 mrad/hr on a handheld meter while walking around an
outdoor storage area. I'm stressing that this is a calculated result
because it's the maximum calculated difference. The minimum calculated
difference is between 0.02 mrad/hr to 0.04 mrad/hr. Actual dose rates
should fall somewhere in between.
Is this a reasonable expectation, or is it asking too much of an outdoor
walk-around with a hand held meter? BTW, I have no idea what the radon
conditions are.
thx in advance - -jmr
John Rich
312-269-3768
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list