[ RadSafe ] "Communicating with the public and the press"

[William Lipton]

Are you saying it takes a "prophetic" engineer to flood protect
emergency systems at a tsunami susceptible plant?
Bill Lipton


Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Estabrooks, H Bates (IHK)
Sent: 8/21/2013 8:47
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu; Peter Crane; William Lipton
Cc: Estabrooks, H Bates (IHK)
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] "Communicating with the public and the press"
Bill,

How far beyond the "beyond design basis event/accident" do you design for?

The magnitudes of the earthquake and resultant tsunami were
historically unprecedented.

To insist on a design/build to protect against them would not have
called for a "courageous" engineer, but rather a prophetic engineer.
So far we have no degree programs for that skill.

Bates Estabrooks
Y-12



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of William
Lipton
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:38 AM
To: Peter Crane; radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] "Communicating with the public and the press"

 (Otto G. Raabe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Instead of debating what brand of lipstick to put on the pig, we should
be addressing the real safety issues. You can never explain away
Fukushima or other fiascos.

Compliance with the letter of the regs is not good enough. One engineer
with the competence and courage to insist the emergency generators be
flood protected would have prevented a tragedy that will affect
generations.
Bill Lipton
It's not about dose, it's about trust.