[ RadSafe ] Article by Vincent Giuliano on "Radiation Hormesis"

Jerry Cohen jjcohen at prodigy.net
Wed Jan 30 14:10:20 CST 2013


More to the point---How do you convince EPA that setting rational standards 
will not adversely affect their importance and/or funding levels


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Otto G. Raabe" <ograabe at ucdavis.edu>
To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" 
<radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Article by Vincent Giuliano on "Radiation Hormesis"


> So, now how do we convince EPA that 15 mrem per year (the expensive super 
> fund cleanup standard) is not hazardous?
>
> Otto
>
>
> **********************************************
> Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
> Center for Health & the Environment
> University of California
> One Shields Avenue
> Davis, CA 95616
> E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
> Phone: (530) 752-7754   FAX: (530) 758-6140
> *********************************************** 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu 



More information about the RadSafe mailing list