[ RadSafe ] Article by Vincent Giuliano on "Radiation Hormesis"
Jerry Cohen
jjcohen at prodigy.net
Wed Jan 30 14:10:20 CST 2013
More to the point---How do you convince EPA that setting rational standards
will not adversely affect their importance and/or funding levels
----- Original Message -----
From: "Otto G. Raabe" <ograabe at ucdavis.edu>
To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List"
<radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Article by Vincent Giuliano on "Radiation Hormesis"
> So, now how do we convince EPA that 15 mrem per year (the expensive super
> fund cleanup standard) is not hazardous?
>
> Otto
>
>
> **********************************************
> Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
> Center for Health & the Environment
> University of California
> One Shields Avenue
> Davis, CA 95616
> E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
> Phone: (530) 752-7754 FAX: (530) 758-6140
> ***********************************************
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list