[ RadSafe ] Fwd: Convincing the EPA

Chris Alston achris1999 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 15:39:34 CST 2013


It's possible that you are right.  But bear in mind that there are
likely people at the EPA who believe in the LNT hypothesis, or have
anyway adopted it as the basis of their thinking, and that they are
concerned with constraining risks at the level of 1/1,000,000.  There
is not a lot of wiggle-room down there.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: patricia lewis <lewis at radonmine.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:47 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Convincing the EPA
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu

Otto, I think the EPA already knows that (15 mrem is no hazard), but won't
admit publicly....?

Patricia Lewis
Free Enterprise Radon Health Mine / Mine Motel
PO Box 67 - Boulder MT 59632
406 225-3383 (NOV 1-MAR 31 - office message only)
888 890-5860 (anytime toll free)
Opt In Newsletter:   http://tinyletter.com/RadonMine
Website:   http ://www.radonmine.com <http://www.radonmine.com/>
WordPress Blog:   http://www.radonmine.com/blog/
*"like" us on Facebook !*
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu

More information about the RadSafe mailing list