[ RadSafe ] Teller and Climate change

[marco bähler]

EDWARD TELLER

half a century ago, edward teller said:
" ... not a single atomic power plant should be built above the ground..." 
( fuller, john g : we almost lost detroit, page 123 ) 

marco bähler
kleindorfstrasse 105
ch- 8707 uetikon
switzerland


Am 01.03.2013 um 19:49 schrieb Howard Long:

> Climate changes are NOT human caused by carbon combustion,
> Susan! Pertinence to health physics is clear, as with "Vitamin R", radiation hormesis.
> 
> Edward Teller leads our 32,000 scientists, at www.petitionproject.org 
> with conclusive data backing REJECTION  of the selective, global tax hoax of
> global cooling, global warming or climate change.
> 
> Howard Long MD, MPH, Board member of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness
>       (started by Edward Teller)
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:59 PM, S L Gawarecki <slgawarecki at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This is a radiation safety list.  Most of the folks here are technical
>> experts in the field of health physics, nuclear engineering, or a related
>> field dealing with radioactivity.  I've notice that this group tend to
>> reject and marginalize those agenda-driven list members (generally
>> anti-nuclear activists) who advance theories about the terrible health
>> effects of DU or exposure to low level radiation.
>> 
>> Similarly, climate scientists know that the buildup of greenhouse gases is
>> causing global warming.  Like all of you, they are technical experts in
>> their field.  And yes, they marginalize and reject those that disagree with
>> them and who aren't willing to examine the scientific underpinnings.
>> 
>> Interestingly, it was the former CEO of ExxonMobil that funded a group of
>> scientists to come up with arguments against human-induced global warming
>> because to have carbon controls become government policy would harm his
>> company.  This was eagerly accepted by a largely conservative audience to
>> serve partisan ends.
>> 
>> I suggest that if you have serious doubts about the human-caused component
>> of global warming, go talk to several climate scientists (not
>> meteorologists--weather is different from climate) and have a look at their
>> data.  The science is there, just like it is for those who work with
>> radiation.
>> 
>> Regards,*
>> **Susan Gawarecki*
>> 
>> ph: 865-494-0102
>> cell:  865-604-3724
>> SLGawarecki at gmail.com
>> 
>> Steve Frey wrote:
>> "Unconvincing. And the "To deny any link between greenhouse gases and the
>> average Earth temperature reality is an extreme case of hubris"remark is not
>> only patronizing, it's hysteria weakens your claim.
>> 
>> Since global warming proponents got caught conspiring to ostracize critics
>> in the University of East Anglia email dump, global warming lost its
>> credibility. Moreover, changing of "global warming" to "climate change" is
>> actually refreshing, because it smacks of recognition by proponents that the
>> public isn't buying it. But, what a whopper of a mistake to rename it such
>> that every weather problem can be attributed to greenhouse gases. All  of
>> it,
>> all the time. You might as well cry "Wolf!"."
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu