[ RadSafe ] Teller and Climate change
emgoldin at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 4 16:53:36 CST 2013
Thanks for some rational thought Susan. I always wonder about those who accept computer models showing the safety of Yucca Mountain and reject the computer models showing climate change. Ya can't have your cake and eat it too . . . . Eric Goldin, CHP
te: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:56:05 -0500
From: S L Gawarecki <slgawarecki at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Teller and Climate change
To: RadSafe <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
<CABtrgkVhxvYFu8LXxeTT_RkSGcte2_9nccH5AG2jDEOmZEXJzA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
How many of these scientists are CLIMATE scientists?
Think about how many scientists with the Union of Concerned Scientists are
convinced that nuclear power can never be safe, that any level of radiation
exposure will cause cancer, etc.
Scientists taking positions outside of their field are not much better at
judging the pertinent technical issues than the informed lay person.
Moreover, they are not immune from having political and social agendas
And if you reject global warming, I can send numerous links that
demonstrate the accelerated melting of mountain glaciers, ice caps, and sea
ice over the past 40 or so years.
SLGawarecki at gmail.com
Howard Long wrote:
"Edward Teller leads our 32,000 scientists, at www.petitionproject.org
with conclusive data backing REJECTION of the selective, global tax hoax
of global cooling, global warming or climate change."
More information about the RadSafe