[ RadSafe ] What's Killing The Nuclear Industry?

[Yahoo Mail Inc]

Before retirement, I spent many years in work associiated with nuclear power 
production. Of course. I knew many people  involved in the industry. However, I 
don't know of anyone in management or operational positions who was unaware of 
the potential dangers and/or was unconcerned and considered safety unimportant. 
So, who were these people in nuclear power production who were unconcerned 
and/or
indifferent toward safety and therefore untrustworthy.
Jarry Cohen


________________________________
From: Nick Tsurikov <nick.tsurikov at gmail.com>
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List 
<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 7:00:19 AM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] What's Killing The Nuclear Industry?

Dear William,
I wholeheartedly agree.  And we can, in many cases, put the same thing to
the mining and processing industry as well, and not just to uranium - but
to all NORM/TENORM things as well... Sadly...
Kind regards and thank you very much for an excellent point.
Nick Tsurikov, Western Australia

-----Original Message-----
> From: William Lipton <doctorbill34 at gmail.com>
> To: radsafe <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Sent: Mon, May 13, 2013 1:43 pm
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] What's Killing The Nuclear Industry?
>
>
> As a supporter of nuclear power, who retired after working 26 years at a
> nuclear power plant, it is frustrating to read the many postings and
> arguments regarding LNT, hormesis, mutated tomatoes at Fukushima, the
> dangers of coal,  etc.  You don't get it!
>
> The future of nuclear power will NOT be decided by whether low level
> radiation exposure is good or bad, whether the media is biased, whether our
> government is controlled by antinukes, or whether other ways of producing
> electricity are just as hazardous.
>
> There is only one question that the public cares about:  Can the nuclear
> industry be trusted to manage the technology?
>
> I dare anyone to answer, "Yes," to that.
>
> Going forward, discussions should focus on what we can do to change this
> situation.  The burden of proof is on us.
>
> Bill Lipton
> It's not about dose, it's about trust.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://health.phys.iit.edu