[ RadSafe ] Anyone want to take over the list

Sun Aug 17 16:01:40 CDT 2014

or maybe easier --- there is the "reply to" field.  Maybe that could be 
used - I don't know.  HOWEVER - if that were used a simple "reply" would 
go to that person only - and "reply all" to that person AND the list - a 
function which USED to be possible - albeit in reverse.

I always kind of liked simply being able to CHOOSE to reply to ONE or ALL.

On 8/17/2014 1:57 PM, Jeff Terry wrote:
> If anyone knows how to do it. I'll pass it along to our tech people.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Ted de Castro <tdc at xrayted.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think he means for the Listserver to insert that information automatically - just as it does "[RADSAFE]" - all in all a quite reasonable suggestion!  It seems reasonable that if a fixed field can be inserted that with some ingenuity someone could find a way to insert a variable - "sender" - field.
>>
>>
>>> On 8/17/2014 1:48 PM, Jeff Terry wrote:
>>> No guarantee that people will remember to do that every time.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Dimiter Popoff <didi at tgi-sci.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>
>>>>> We have dealt with many of those issues and that is why they require the posters name and email to be attached.
>>>> why is it such a problem? What's wrong with simply putting the name and email of the posting person
>>>> in the subject line, instead of what now is [Radsafe]. Somewhat longer but marked by brackets
>>>> so still easily machine-identifiable for thread chasing code.
>>>> The [Radsafe] can just go as the From: address will already carry that information.
>>>>
>>>> Dimiter
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Dimiter Popoff, TGI             http://www.tgi-sci.com
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From: Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:16:47 -0500
>>>>> To: "The International Radiation Protection \(Health Physics\) Mailing List"
>>>>>     <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Anyone want to take over the list
>>>>>
>>>>> We have dealt with many of those issues and that is why they require the posters name and email to be attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> We've monitored the situation on other listservers that have changed there policy and too many messages come with no attribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem know is that as more groups adopt the spam blocking standard, we are losing much of the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Sander Perle <sandyfl at cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was the concern with both University of Illinois when under Melissa Woo
>>>>>> and at Vanderbilt under Mike Stabin. Threats of litigation and other
>>>>>> unbelievable accusations led to their terminating the list server on their
>>>>>> systems. A real shame!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sandy
>>>>>> Retired, Consultant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From:  Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu>
>>>>>> Reply-To:  "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>>>>>> List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
>>>>>> Date:  Sunday, August 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM
>>>>>> To:  "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List"
>>>>>> <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
>>>>>> Subject:  Re: [ RadSafe ] Anyone want to take over the list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The listserver can support the new standard but the University does not want
>>>>>> posts not having the posters name and email attached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> University wants post properly attributed to the poster as opposed to the
>>>>>> the new standard below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new standard would require all posts to be:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:59 pm, The International Radiation Protection (Health
>>>>>> Physics) Mailing List <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blah, Blah, Blah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can the university support the new standard?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan ii
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
>>>>>>> 108 Sherwood Blvd
>>>>>>> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
>>>>>>> +1-505-672-2014 (Home  New Mexico)
>>>>>>> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
>>>>>>> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Excessive bounces to their email addresses. They must have adopted the
>>>>>>>> same standard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why the NRC?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dan ii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
>>>>>>>>> 108 Sherwood Blvd
>>>>>>>>> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
>>>>>>>>> +1-505-672-2014 (Home  New Mexico)
>>>>>>>>> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
>>>>>>>>> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We lost everyone from the NRC off the list today.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are not allowed by the University legal department to take
>>>>>>>>>> responsibility for all list posts by allowing anonymous posting. This is
>>>>>>>>>> the only current solution to blocking of listerservers by some of the
>>>>>>>> major
>>>>>>>>>> internet service providers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If someone else would like to take over the list and run it using that
>>>>>>>>>> method, I would be happy to pass the running of the list along.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, given the steady decline of membership, it may be time to
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>> end the list.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sorry but I don't see another practical solution.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jeff
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>>
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu