[ RadSafe ] DNA can be damaged by very low-energy radiation

[parthasarathy k s]

Dear Dr.Roy Herren,

This EurekAlert news release is issued by Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research(TIFR), Mumbai. TIFR is considered to be the cradle of all nuclear energy developments in India.

I am unable to understand why the researchers did not publish the results in a peer journal before making it public. Am I missing something here?. Their discovery seems to be novel.The general impression is that such low energy photons are not energetic enough to create double strand breaks.

Warm regards
Parthasarathy







On Friday, 14 March 2014, 13:21, ROY HERREN <royherren2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
 
PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:14-Mar-2014 Contact: Deepak Mathur
atmol1 at tifr.res.in
91-222-278-2736
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research 

DNA can be damaged by very low-energy radiation
How safe are 'eye-safe' lasers?
"Very low-energy radiation also damages DNA: how safe are "eye-safe" lasers?"
Damage to DNA by high energy radiation constitutes the most lethal 
damage occurring at the cellular level. Surprisingly, very low-energy 
interactions - with OH radicals, for instance - can also induce DNA 
damage, including double strand breaks. It is known that single strand 
breaks in the DNA backbone are amenable to repair but most double strand breaks are irreparable. The propensity with which slow OH radicals 
damage DNA depends on their rotational energy: rotationally "hot" OH
is more proficient in causing double breaks. These novel findings are 
from experiments conducted on DNA in a physiological environment. 
Intense femtosecond laser pulses are propagated through water (in which 
DNA plasmids are suspended), creating plasma channels within water, 
resulting in
generation, in situ, of electrons and OH radicals. It is shown that use 
of long laser wavelength light (1350 nm and 2200 nm) ensures only 
OH-induced damage to DNA is accessed. It is noteworthy that industry 
presently characterizes as "eye-safe" lasers that emit at wavelengths 
longer than 1300 nm. 
But it is such wavelengths that are proficient at inducing damage to DNA: how safe is "eye-safe" when DNA in the eye can be readily 
damaged? 
###

________________________________
  

AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible 
for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing 
institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! 
system.



HOME   DISCLAIMER   PRIVACY POLICY   TERMS & CONDITIONS   CONTACT US   TOP 
Copyright ©2014 by AAAS, the science society.  
 
Roy Herren
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu