[ RadSafe ] Does Anybody Remember?

McCloskey, Pat Pat.McCloskey at orau.org
Tue Feb 3 06:25:38 CST 2015


I'll bet the author you're thinking of is Bill Minkler. I don't remember the article though.
http://www.ans.org/store/i_690057

Pat McCloskey

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of H.Estabrooks at cns.doe.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 6:51 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List (radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu)
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Does Anybody Remember?

I am working on a presentation and wanted to make a point about the place for common language vs. jargon.

If my aging memory serves me, there was a guy who routinely wrote a column that ran inside the back cover of Nuclear News.  Way back in the early '80s he wrote an article about how people thought papers written with a lot of technical terms made the author look smarter (more credible) than those written in common language.  I think the article was entitled "Into the Fog" or something similar.

Does anyone recall this article, its title and/or the author?  I'd like to get a copy of the article if possible.

Thanks much.

Bates Estabrooks
Y-12 NSC
Radiological Control Engineer-Staff Training Radiological Controls Emergency Program Coordinator
865-574-7376

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu


More information about the RadSafe mailing list