[ RadSafe ] Claim by Japanese Professor - West Coast of North America to be Slammed by 2016 with 80% As Much Fukushima Radiation As Japan
jaro_10kbq at videotron.ca
Thu Jun 11 08:39:27 CDT 2015
D'un Renard appears to be a French activist, but as you say, never gives clues about identity.
The name is French for "From a fox".
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Helbig
Sent: June-11-15 8:23 AM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Claim by Japanese Professor - West Coast of North America to be Slammed by 2016 with 80% As Much Fukushima Radiation As Japan
Does this professor have any credibility or are they just someone like Busby who is an activist (or professional fear monger)?
Does anyone know who this coward DunRenard is - they have a YouTube channel, but seem to be unwilling to tell you who they are or what their "qualifications" are.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: nuclear-news <comment-reply at wordpress.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:22 PM
Subject: [New post] West Coast of North America to be Slammed by 2016 with 80% As Much Fukushima Radiation As Japan
To: rwhelbig at gmail.com
dunrenard posted: "A professor from Japan’s Fukushima University Institute of Environmental Radioactivity (Michio Aoyama) told Kyodo in April that the West Coast of North America will be hit with around 800 terabecquerels of Cesium- 137 by 2016. EneNews notes that this i"
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on nuclear-news
West Coast of North America to be Slammed by 2016 with 80% As Much Fukushima Radiation As Japan
A professor from Japan’s Fukushima University Institute of Environmental Radioactivity (Michio Aoyama) told Kyodo in April that the West Coast of North America will be hit with around 800 terabecquerels of Cesium- 137 by 2016.
EneNews notes that this is 80% of the cesium-137 deposited in Japan by Fukushima, according to the company which runs Fukushima, Tepco:
(a petabequeral or “PBq” equals 1,000 terabecquerels.)
This is not news for those who have been paying attention. For example, we noted 2 days after the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami that the West Coast of North America could be slammed with radiation from Fukushima.
We pointed out the next year that a previously-secret 1955 U.S.
government report concluded that the ocean may not adequately dilute radiation from nuclear accidents, and there could be “pockets” and “streams” of highly-concentrated radiation.
The same year, we noted that 15 out of 15 bluefin tuna tested in California waters were contaminated with Fukushima radiation.
In 2013, we warned that the West Coast of North America would be hit hard by Fukushima radiation.
And we’ve noted for years that there is no real testing of Fukushima radiation by any government agency.
Indeed, scientists say that the amount of the West Coast of North America could end up exceeding that off the Japanese coast.
What’s the worst case scenario? That the mass die-off of sealife off the West Coast of North America – which may have started only a couple of months after the Fukushima melt-down – is being caused by radiation from Fukushima.
Source: Washington's blog
dunrenard | June 11, 2015 at 6:22 am | Tags: Fukushima Daiichi |
Categories: Japan | URL: http://wp.me/phgse-jHl
Comment See all comments
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from nuclear-news.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe