[ RadSafe ] Help with a California new x-ray installation question ...

Dixon, John E. (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) gyf7 at cdc.gov
Fri Jun 26 07:55:39 CDT 2015


I believe the 'template' is contained within NCRP-147.

Regards,
John

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ted de Castro
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 5:46 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Help with a California new x-ray installation question ...

Since there seems to be no way to contact the Northern California Chapter (their posted email contacts don't work) to make this query appropriately local; I am posting it here (sorry - at least its on topic!):

I am helping a company get started with a new x-ray installation. ONE machine, incredibly well interlocked and shielded.  I've already done some training - and they don't even have the machine yet --- but soon.

The State requires a Radiation Protection Program Document - I've downloaded and read their guidance document.  Seems simple enough but I don't want to underestimate it.  The only live examples I've found online are for mega institutions like Stanford.  I'm really happy to see such things available - however - I don't want to over do this either.

So I am looking for working, accepted program documents for similarly small scale, low risk/impact facilities - maybe something with a 100kv TEM or 2 - although this would be more like analytical in use - more like an SEM in risk.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu


More information about the RadSafe mailing list