[ RadSafe ] Help with a California new x-ray installation question ...

[Ted de Castro]

I made almost this exact same query almost a year ago - and got the same 
answer.  That template is way way too much.  It great if you are doing a 
major research or medical center - but not for your case.

Anyhow with a few more queries I finally got in touch with a very 
helpful state inspector and got a very good sample from a state 
facility.  I also found a few short examples on the web - but that 
sample was the most help.  We used it as out template and it was 
accepted with only one small change.

I will forward you the material I found in a separate email.

On 6/26/2015 5:55 AM, Dixon, John E. (CDC/ONDIEH/NCEH) wrote:
> I believe the 'template' is contained within NCRP-147.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ted de Castro
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 5:46 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Help with a California new x-ray installation question ...
>
> Since there seems to be no way to contact the Northern California Chapter (their posted email contacts don't work) to make this query appropriately local; I am posting it here (sorry - at least its on topic!):
>
> I am helping a company get started with a new x-ray installation. ONE machine, incredibly well interlocked and shielded.  I've already done some training - and they don't even have the machine yet --- but soon.
>
> The State requires a Radiation Protection Program Document - I've downloaded and read their guidance document.  Seems simple enough but I don't want to underestimate it.  The only live examples I've found online are for mega institutions like Stanford.  I'm really happy to see such things available - however - I don't want to over do this either.
>
> So I am looking for working, accepted program documents for similarly small scale, low risk/impact facilities - maybe something with a 100kv TEM or 2 - although this would be more like analytical in use - more like an SEM in risk.
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu